No Logo Available

UNIVERSAL DEVELOPERS

4.4/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Goa
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding Universal Developers: Complaints and Legal Landscape

When considering a builder for your next property investment, it's crucial to scrutinize their track record in terms of customer satisfaction and legal disputes. In this blog post, we'll delve into the case history of Universal Developers, highlighting their legal challenges, outcomes, and what potential buyers should keep in mind.

Overview of the Builder

Universal Developers has engaged in the real estate market with an active presence in Goa. Despite their operations, they have faced a total of two complaints, resulting in a split decision with one case won and one case lost. This sets the stage for potential buyers to evaluate their reliability and the quality of services provided.

Analyzing Legal Cases

Cases Lost:
In the sole case against them that resulted in a loss, a complainant alleged that Universal Developers sold a common area to a third party, which was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Amenities Provision Disputes Arbitration Invocation Issues

Analysis of the cases filed against Universal Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: amenities provision disputes and issues related to invoking arbitration.

In terms of amenities provision disputes, the cases often involve claims from complainants that the builder failed to deliver promised amenities to the project. This is a common reason for dissatisfaction among buyers, as amenities are a crucial factor in the decision to purchase property. The builder's defense often revolves around contractual clauses, in this instance, an arbitration clause, which they attempted to use to divert the claims into an arbitration process rather than addressing the core issues raised.

The frequent invocation of arbitration by the builder suggests a defensive strategy aimed at delaying or circumventing direct legal action. However, as evidenced by the outcomes, this approach was not successful, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Jurisdictional Disputes Claims of Amenities Non-Compliance Land Usage Disputes Common Area Regulations

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Universal Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information. Several common themes emerged from these cases, which can be grouped as follows:

  1. Jurisdictional Disputes: Many claims made by buyers revolved around the jurisdiction of the RERA Act versus Civil Court matters. The builder successfully argued that certain issues raised by complainants were not within the realm of real estate regulations but fell under Civil Court's intervention.
  2. Claims of Amenities Non-Compliance: Some complaints centered on the allegation of inadequate amenities, such as the proper access to common areas and facilities. Here, the builder defended through demonstrating compliance with existing regulations and provisions regarding common areas.
  3. Land Usage Disputes: Disputes over land classification or how land was being utilized also appeared. In these situations, the builder argued the legality of their actions regarding land use, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review