CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Navigating the world of property builders can be a daunting task, especially with the multitude of choices available. One builder that has come to attention is Universal Infra Build, which operates primarily in Gujarat. In this blog post, we will delve into the available data on Universal Infra Build, discussing their legal history and providing insights that potential buyers should consider.
Universal Infra Build has a notable record of complaints. With one complaint lodged against them, it is important to analyze the outcome of this case. Unfortunately, Universal Infra Build lost this case, which adds a layer of caution for prospective buyers.
In the instance of their legal troubles, the final verdict saw the promoters penalized for failing to submit final reports on project completions. The penalties ranged significantly, from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 4,90,000, indicating a serious oversight on the part of the builder.
Examining the legal history reveals important insights:
In conclusion, Universal Infra Build's record raises significant flags for potential home buyers. While the builder is active in Gujarat, the singular legal complaint and the loss of that case should prompt caution. Buyers must consider whether they are willing to take the risk associated with a builder who has not only lost a case but has also incurred financial penalties for overlooking project documentation.
For those considering purchasing from Universal Infra Build, here are a few suggestions:
With careful consideration and thorough research, buyers can make informed decisions and mitigate risks when selecting a builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Universal Infra Build, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into penalties for project delays, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project completion reporting.
The primary reason for the litigation in these cases revolves around the builder's failure to adhere to the required timelines for project completion. Many of the cases highlight the promoters' inability to submit final reports on their projects, which led to penalties ranging from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 4,90,000. This indicates a systemic issue where the builder may have either mismanaged expectations or faced challenges that were not addressed promptly.
Common triggers for the builder’s litigation include contesting these penalties and disputes over their obligations regarding project reporting. The builder likely argued that the delays were caused by unforeseen circumstances or other parties involved in the project, yet the outcomes suggest that the defenses presented were insufficient to mitigate the penalties.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to non-compliance with regulatory requirements. The failure to submit timely project completion reports not only incurred penalties but also highlighted a broader lack of adherence to essential guidelines in real estate development. In each case, the verdicts reflect a pattern where the builder’s actions fell short of the expectations established by both regulatory frameworks and customer agreements.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to evaluate a builder's track record regarding project timelines and regulatory compliance. Delays and disputes, as seen in Universal Infra Build's cases, could signify deeper operational issues that may affect buyers' investments.