U.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
- States Active In: U.P., Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate and industrial development, understanding a builder's legal standing can provide significant insight into their reliability and commitment to buyers. In this blog post, we delve into the U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (UPSIDC), analyzing their legal battles and outcomes to better inform potential customers.
Legal Landscape of UPSIDC
UPSIDC has faced a total of six complaints against them, with a mixed record of legal success. Out of these, the corporation won only one case while losing five. This presents a picture of a builder that may encounter frequent legal challenges, which potential buyers should consider.
Patterns in Cases Lost
Examining the five cases that UPSIDC lost reveals some notable patterns:
- Condonation of Delay Issues: A recurring theme involves the builder's struggles with filing appeals in a timely manner. In multiple instances, the delays were attributed to various reasons such as seeking …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, which it lost, reveals several notable themes.
Delayed Possession Claims
A recurring theme in these cases is the builder's disputes over possession delays. In multiple cases, the builder claimed that the inability to meet possession deadlines was due to various external factors, such as the time taken for legal advisory or technical procedural steps. However, the respondents in these matters presented strong arguments highlighting the builder's responsibility to deliver timely possession as previously agreed upon. This showcases a pattern of the builder attempting to push the blame for delays onto external factors instead of taking accountability.
Condonation of Delay in Appeals
Several cases revealed the builder's attempts to seek condonation of delay in filing appeals. In these instances, the builder often cited reasons that were dismissed by the courts as insufficient. …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases filed generally revolved around several themes, notably the delay condonation processes, compliance with Supreme Court orders, and issues arising from the respondents' lack of objections to delays.
The builder frequently brought these cases to court to contest penalties levied against them and address issues regarding delays that were often attributed to external factors. Breakdowns often occurred when the builder sought to clarify the legal grounds of their projects and their adherence to laid-down procedures, sometimes resulting from misunderstandings of project classification.
The common reasons for the builder's success in these cases usually centered around insufficient evidence from the opposing party, where respondents either lacked valid claims or failed to follow required legal protocols. This ability to navigate through legal hurdles showcases that the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from U.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.