CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering purchasing property, understanding the track record of builders and developers is crucial. In this post, we will delve into the legal history and operational integrity of Upasana Buildcon LLP, a company operating in Rajasthan, to provide potential buyers with insightful information.
Upasana Buildcon LLP is a builder that currently has activities concentrated exclusively in the state of Rajasthan. Although the company has a relatively low number of complaints against it, it's essential to analyze the details surrounding its legal cases to assess its reliability and trustworthiness.
Upasana Buildcon LLP has been involved in a total of two legal cases:
The cases highlight a concerning trend, as the company has not emerged victorious in any legal disputes it faced. In the singular case where legal action was taken against them, Upasana Buildcon LLP was found liable for breaching statutory provisions, resulting in a monetary penalty of Rs 5,000.
It's evident from the existing data that Upasana Buildcon LLP faces challenges in its legal dealings. Specifically:
Considering the current evidence, potential buyers should approach their dealings with Upasana Buildcon LLP with caution. The builder has faced at least one significant legal challenge that raised issues of compliance with statutory regulations. While the builder has not been involved in multiple complaints, the absence of any victories in legal cases is a point of concern.
In conclusion, while Upasana Buildcon LLP may offer opportunities in the real estate market in Rajasthan, potential buyers should remain attentive to the builder’s legal history, which suggests the need for due diligence to safeguard their investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Upasana Buildcon LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two primary topics: statutory compliance disputes and regulatory non-compliance penalties.
The statutory compliance disputes typically involve allegations of the builder failing to adhere to legal or regulatory requirements governing real estate development. For instance, the builder may have been accused of violating municipal orders or failing to obtain necessary approvals for project modifications. These cases often center around the builder’s obligations to ensure that their projects align with established laws and regulations, and the implications of non-compliance on the integrity of the development.
Regulatory non-compliance penalties, on the other hand, focus specifically on the repercussions that the builder faces for violating these regulations. This can include financial penalties, as seen in the summary where the builder was found liable and fined Rs 5,000. The primary concern in these cases is the builder’s accountability for their actions and the enforcement of regulatory standards to protect the interests of buyers and the broader community.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the imposed penalties, disputing claims of delay caused by other parties, and disagreements over land classification or conversion. The builder may argue that the delays are attributable to external factors rather than their own actions, or they may contest the severity of the penalties based on the perceived triviality of the regulatory breaches.
The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that one of the most common triggers for the builder's litigation is a defensive response to accusations of non-compliance or delay. Instead of proactively addressing regulatory concerns, the builder often finds themselves in a reactive position, which can lead to further complications and legal costs.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, most notably insufficient evidence to support their claims, a clear history of non-compliance with statutory provisions, and a lack of understanding of regulatory requirements. The imposition of penalties suggests that the builder failed to meet the required legal standards, and the outcomes serve as a warning to potential buyers about the builder's accountability and reliability.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!