UPPAL HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Uppal Housing Private Limited is a prominent builder operating primarily in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, where it has garnered attention through multiple legal disputes. With 96 complaints filed against it, the builder has won 78 cases and lost 18, providing a mixed picture of its operational integrity.

Overview of Cases

Complaints Filed

• Total Complaints: 96
• Cases Won: 78
• Cases Lost: 18

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

1. Absence of Complainant Participation: A significant number of cases that Uppal Housing lost were dismissed due to the non-appearance of complainants at hearings. This suggests a possible lack of commitment from complainants or issues related to the handling of their cases, potentially diminishing the strength of their claims.
2. Specific Claims for Refunds: Many cases involved claims for substantial refunds, particularly one notable instance where complainants sought a refund of Rs. 1,01,00,100 along with compensation for mental harassment. This highlights financial disputes …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Uppal Housing Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Refund and Compensation Disputes, Breach of Contract and Agreement, and Project Abandonment Allegations. The majority of the claims were related to delayed possession of flats, with complainants often seeking refunds due to the builder's failure to hand over property within the stipulated time.

People commonly brought cases to court in these categories because of a few overarching reasons. Many contested the builder's inability to provide timely possession, which led to claims for refunds and compensation for mental harassment and financial losses. Some disputes revolved around the builder's adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the purchase agreements, where complainants alleged breaches that resulted in legal action.

A consistent …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Uppal Housing Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

Delayed Possession Claims

A recurring theme in several cases involves complaints from buyers regarding the delay in possession of their flats. Complainants alleged that the builder had failed to provide timely possession and that the projects were not completed as per agreements. However, the builder successfully defended these claims by presenting evidence such as completion certificates, demonstrating that construction was completed on schedule, thus leading to the dismissal of these complaints.

Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements

This theme is illustrated by complaints that the builder did not register their project under the applicable real estate regulations. The builder successfully showed that they had applied for necessary registrations and received the relevant occupancy certificates. Consequently, these cases were dismissed due to the builder's compliance with legal requisites …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis