URBAN PLUS INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When choosing a builder for your next real estate investment, having a clear picture of their reputation, legal history, and customer satisfaction can be crucial in making an informed decision. This post takes a closer look at Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited, a builder based in Haryana, to help potential buyers assess their credibility and reliability.

Overview of Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited

Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited has faced a total of four complaints, with the unfortunate result of losing all four cases. This record raises concerns for potential customers considering investing in properties under this builder's name.

Legal Case Details and Patterns in the Complaints

All four cases against Urban Plus centered around the failure to deliver possession of properties, which has become a significant issue for the appellants.

The two detailed cases have striking similarities:

• Common Claims: In both instances, complainants sought refunds of substantial amounts (Rs. 72,42,935/-) due to the alleged failure to complete the assigned projects. Besides a refund, they also requested interest and compensation for the delay, indicating financial loss and disappointment because of unmet expectations from the builder.
• Builder's Resistance: Urban Plus argued that the project was ongoing and not abandoned, attempting to shift the blame for delays onto the clients by stating that the complainants had not paid the remaining amounts due.
• Verdict Patterns: Each case concluded with the Authority demanding that Urban Plus refund the full amounts along with interest and compensation for legal expenses. This repeated loss suggests a troubling trend where the builder could not substantiate their claims against disgruntled customers.

Analysis of Cases Won

Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited has faced cases where they were previously involved, which could provide insights into their operational strategies. However, it’s significant to note that they have not won any cases. The cases involved claims for refunds due to delays, but anything classified as a 'win' resulted in the tribunal ordering the case to be further examined by an adjudicating authority—a status fraught with implications for the builder’s management of expectations and timelines.

Conclusion: An Assessment of Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited

Based on the provided data, Urban Plus seems to be struggling significantly with project delivery and client satisfaction. The complete loss of all four complaints raises significant red flags regarding how they operate as a builder. Potential investors should carefully consider the implications of this when evaluating their options in the real estate market.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research Thoroughly: Before making a purchase, conduct comprehensive research on the builder’s track record, including any complaints lodged against them.
• Seek Professional Advice: Consult with real estate experts or legal advisors to better understand the implications of any ongoing or past litigation involving the builder.
• Look for Reviews: Engage with other buyers or online reviews to gauge experiences with the builder, which might provide insight into potential red flags or positives.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Inspect Previous Projects: Visit completed projects to assess the quality and timely delivery.
2. Verify Legal Status: Ensure the builder has a clear legal standing without significant complaints or lawsuits.
3. Assess Financial Stability: Investigate the financial health of the builder to confirm they can sustain ongoing projects.
4. Focus on Transparency: Look for builders who provide clear contracts outlining delivery timelines and quality standards.
5. Engage a Buyer’s Agent: If possible, consider hiring a buyer's agent who can guide you through the selection processes and negotiations.

In summary, while Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited operates within Haryana, the history of unsuccessful cases should give potential homeowners a reason to proceed with caution.

Analysis of the cases filed against Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three common themes: delayed possession claims, project abandonment and refund claims, and disputes over payment delays and charges.

The majority of the claims made by the appellants were centered around the delayed delivery of possession of flats. In these cases, the appellants sought refunds of the entire amount deposited with the builder, along with interest, compensation, and litigation costs. The builder, on the other hand, countered with claims that the appellants were liable to pay delayed payment charges at a rate of 10.75% per annum for their defaults. However, the tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the appellants, indicating a systemic issue with the builder's ability to deliver projects on time.

Another significant theme emerged from the cases involving project abandonment. The complainants sought substantial refunds—amounting to Rs. 72,42,935—after alleging that the builder failed to complete a real estate project and deliver possession of the allotted units. The builder's defense—that the project was ongoing and not abandoned—was ultimately inadequate, as evidenced by the authority's decision to order full refunds along with interest and compensation. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may misrepresent project statuses to avoid fulfilling their commitments.

The disputes over payment delays and charges reflect a common trigger for the builder's litigation. In multiple instances, the builder sought to penalize buyers for late payments, which raises questions about the builder's adherence to realistic payment schedules and their understanding of the financial constraints faced by buyers. The tribunal's rejection of these penalty claims suggests that the builder's approach may be overly aggressive and non-compliant with regulatory requirements.

The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases are multifaceted. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely project delivery or ongoing construction was a critical factor. Additionally, the builder's reliance on penalty claims for late payments appears to be misaligned with the tribunals' interpretations of contractual obligations and consumer rights. Finally, the failure to follow interim directions and fulfill project commitments led to severe legal consequences, including substantial refunds and compensation payouts.

In conclusion, the analysis of these cases paints a concerning picture of Urban Plus Infrabuild Private Limited's operational legitimacy. Buyers should approach this builder with caution due to the patterns of delayed possession, project abandonment, and disputes centered around payment delays and penalties that are evident in these legal disputes.