URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the reliability and trustworthiness of builders are paramount for prospective buyers. URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY, a builder primarily operating in Gujarat, has a checkered legal history with one recorded complaint. In this blog post, we delve into the details of their legal cases, examining both their losses and wins, to provide potential buyers with crucial insights.

Legal Case Overview

URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY has faced one legal complaint. The details of this case offer a glimpse into the builder's compliance with important regulations:

1. Cases Filed Against the Builder: 1
   - Cases Won: 0
   - Cases Lost: 1

The sole complaint highlights a significant legal challenge where the builder was found to have violated regulations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Details of the Case

• Appellant Claim: The claim indicated that the builder advertised a project without including the necessary RERA registration number and website, which is a requirement aimed at ensuring transparency and consumer protection.
• Respondent Claim: In defense, URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY argued that the violation was unintentional and admitted the error in the advertisement.
• Final Verdict: The authority imposed a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 on the builder for their failure to adhere to the aforementioned regulatory requirement.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

• Pattern: The single case that URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY lost centered around a clear violation of regulatory practices intended to protect buyers. The non-disclosure of essential information in advertisements suggests a possible oversight in compliance protocols or an inadequate understanding of regulatory requirements.

Cases Won

• Pattern: Interestingly, it should be noted that there are no cases won by the builder. This lack of success in legal disputes may point to a limited ability to contest claims or address grievances effectively in a formal setting.

Conclusion

In summary, URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY has a record of one legal complaint resulting in a loss, which raises concerns about their commitment to regulatory compliance and transparency. The imposed fine indicates a critical need for vigilance on their part to avoid further legal issues.

Tips for Potential Buyers

For potential buyers considering URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY, it is essential to:

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Examine the builder’s legal history beyond just the number of complaints. Look for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers to gauge their experiences.
2. Demand Transparency: Ensure that all provided information is clear and aligns with regulatory requirements. Request RERA registration details upfront.
3. Assess Project Documentation: Before finalizing any purchase, scrutinize all project-related documentation meticulously to catch any inconsistencies.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Credentials: Verify the builder’s registration with RERA and check their legal standing and any existing complaints or litigation.
2. Look for Experience: A builder with a long-standing reputation may offer security, especially if they have a history of successful project completions.
3. Visit Existing Projects: Inspect completed projects to evaluate construction quality and adherence to timelines.
4. Understand the Financial Health: Ensure the builder has strong financial backing to complete the project as planned.

By remaining informed and cautious, buyers can navigate the complex landscape of real estate and make smarter purchasing decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the various disputes. The cases can be primarily grouped into two common themes: regulatory non-compliance and advertisement violations.

The regulatory non-compliance theme encompasses a range of issues, primarily centered around the builder's obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). In one significant case, the builder was found to have violated Section 11(2) of RERA by advertising a project without adequately displaying the required RERA registration number and website. This highlights a pattern of neglecting regulatory compliance, which has been a common trigger for legal disputes in the real estate sector.

People commonly bring cases against builders to contest what they perceive as breaches of statutory duties, particularly in relation to transparency and information disclosure in advertising. In the case against URMILL PARIKH TIA REALTY, the penalty imposed (Rs. 1,25,000) demonstrates not only the legal obligations builders have under RERA but also the authority's commitment to enforcing these regulations to protect potential buyers.

The builder's defense in these cases often revolves around claims of unintentional violations, as seen in the acknowledgment of the defect in the advertisement. However, this defense typically falls short, as regulators and courts often view such infractions as significant, regardless of intent. Insufficient evidence of compliance or failure to meet regulatory standards consistently emerges as a primary reason builders lose these cases.

In conclusion, the analysis shows that builders face significant legal risks when they do not adhere to the regulatory framework established by RERA. Prospective buyers should take these cases into account when evaluating builders, as a history of regulatory non-compliance may indicate a lack of transparency and reliability in their projects.