| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding VAISHNAVI CONSTRUCTIONS: A Comprehensive Review
When considering a builder for your dream home, it's critical to evaluate their track record. VAISHNAVI CONSTRUCTIONS has garnered attention in the real estate market, particularly in the states of Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. This article delves into their complaint history, legal challenges, and case outcomes to help prospective buyers make an informed decision.
Background Information on VAISHNAVI CONSTRUCTIONS
- Number of Complaints: 8
- Cases Won: 2
- Cases Lost: 6
- States with Projects: Madhya Pradesh (MP), Maharashtra
Legal Case Overview
The legal standing of VAISHNAVI CONSTRUCTIONS is marked by both challenges and victories as seen in various cases they were involved in:
Cases Filed and Lost
- Case Summary:
- Claim: The appellant asserted that a prior matter had reached an amicable settlement, with consent terms filed on record. The respondent agreed to receive Rs. 6.15 lakhs from the pre-deposited amount.
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Vaishnavi Constructions, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects. The cases primarily revolved around four key topics: delayed possession claims, compensation for mental distress and damages, refund and interest on consideration amount, and possession disputes based on payment claims.
The majority of the cases were filed due to the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats within the stipulated time frame. For instance, in one case, the applicant claimed that after paying Rs. 8,50,000 for a flat, possession had not been granted, and the amount paid had not been returned. Similarly, other cases involved claims for compensation due to delays in delivering flats and shops, highlighting the pattern that individuals commonly brought cases to court seeking redress for prolonged delays attributed to the builder.
Another recurring theme was the dispute over payment and possession. In …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Vaishnavi Constructions, which it lost, reveals significant insights into their operational and legal challenges.
Upon reviewing the cases, we can categorize the disputes into a couple of recurring themes:
- Consent Settlements: This type of case indicates that while a dispute existed, both parties ultimately reached an agreement outside the court's judgment, leading to a resolution based on pre-arranged terms.
- Payment Disputes: Specifically, in the included case, there was a contention pertaining to payment amounts, where the appellant was obligated to pay a sum to the respondent out of previously deposited funds. This suggests ongoing financial disagreements between the builder and other parties involved in their projects.
The builder tends to initiate litigation frequently regarding payment issues and disputes that might have elements of amicable settlements but require official court involvement to finalize terms. This pattern reveals that Vaishnavi Constructions …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, VAISHNAVI CONSTRUCTIONS, which it won, revealed the following information.
The legal disputes can be broadly categorized into three main themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Financial Compensation for Non-compliance, and Mental Distress Reimbursements.
- Delayed Possession Claims: One recurring issue observed was the builder's involvement in disputes over timely possession of properties. In the notable case summarized, the applicant contended that the non-applicant (the builder) failed to grant possession of the cell within the stipulated period. The lack of a response from the non-applicant signifies a rare scenario but underscores the importance of compliance with timelines.
- Financial Compensation for Non-compliance: Additionally, the cases highlighted claims related to financial compensation for perceived shortcomings in construction or project execution. In a specific ruling, the adjudicating officer mandated the non-applicant to remit Rs. 3,00,000 along with interest, indicating that the builder was found to have …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!