No Logo Available

VAISHNAVI DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (4 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the bustling real estate market of Karnataka, builders often face scrutiny regarding their projects and customer satisfaction. One such builder, Vaishnavi Developers, has recently been in the spotlight due to several complaints and legal cases. This blog delves into the performance of Vaishnavi Developers, analyzing their legal outcomes and the implications for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Builder Name: Vaishnavi Developers
Number of Complaints: 4
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 4
States with Projects: Karnataka

Despite being involved in multiple legal disputes, Vaishnavi Developers has not won a single case. This raises questions about the builder's reliability and the quality of their projects.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

Vaishnavi Developers has faced a total of 4 cases, all of which they lost. The primary complaint across these cases involves a demand for a refund with interest for the project titled ‘Vaishnavi Developers Temple Trees’. Some …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Refund Claims for Project Delays Failure to Respond to Claims Withdrawal of Cases Due to Connected Decisions

Analysis of the cases filed against Vaishnavi Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around claims made by complainants seeking refunds with interest for the project 'Vaishnavi Developers Temple Trees.' The most notable theme in these disputes is the recurring request for refunds due to delays or dissatisfaction with the project.

Common reasons that prompted buyers to take legal action include the builder's failure to complete the project on time, which led to claims for penalties and refunds. There were also instances where the builder did not respond to the claims at all, resulting in a lack of defense or justification for their actions. This silence can often be misconstrued as negligence or an admission of guilt, potentially influencing the outcome of the case.

The outcomes of the cases highlight another interesting pattern: the frequent withdrawal of complaints tied to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review