VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES logo

VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES is a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan, with a legal track record that reflects a challenging business landscape. With only one recorded complaint and a case history showing one loss, it is essential for potential buyers to delve deeper into the implications of this data before deciding to engage with the builder.

Legal Case Overview

VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES has been involved in legal matters with a total of one case filed against them, which resulted in a loss for the builder. The circumstances surrounding this case provide insight into the operational integrity and contractual reliability of the builder.

Case Summary

The sole case against VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES stemmed from the following claims:

  • Appellant Claim: The authority claimed that the promoter did not complete their project within the extended validity period and failed to submit the necessary completion certificate.
  • Respondent Claim: The promoter contended that the project was completed on

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, and penalties for project delays.

The prominent theme in these cases revolves around project delays and the builder's failure to complete projects within stipulated timelines. For instance, in one case, the Authority claimed that the promoter did not complete their project within the extended validity period, which led to a penalty. This highlights a pattern where cases were commonly brought to court due to delays attributed to the builder, resulting in claims for penalties and damages from the regulatory authorities.

People also contested the builder’s actions by disputing their claims of timely project completion. In the example mentioned, the builder claimed to have finished the project by 30.07.2020, yet the evidence apparently did not …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from VARDHMAN ASSOCIATES?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.