VASTUSHODH ERECTORS LLP

Introduction

Vastushodh Erectors LLP has made a name for itself in Maharashtra's real estate sector. However, like many builders, its journey has been marked by various legal challenges. In this article, we will delve into the legal history of Vastushodh Erectors, analyzing both the complaints filed against them and the outcomes of those cases. This analysis aims to provide potential buyers with insights into the builder's track record.

Legal Case Overview

Complaints Filed

Data indicates that Vastushodh Erectors LLP has faced a total of 18 complaints, resulting in 8 cases won and 10 cases lost. Understanding the reasons behind these legal challenges is crucial for prospective homebuyers.

Cases Lost

The 8 cases where the builder lost largely revolve around delay condonation applications. In these instances, the applicants claimed that extra time was needed to file their applications correctly. Conversely, the builder argued that they required additional time …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Vastushodh Erectors LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the board. The cases primarily revolve around three main topics: delay condensation claims, sufficient reasoning for delays, and adherence to stipulated timeframes.

The majority of the claims made by the applicants in these cases center around the need to condone delays in filing their appeals. The applicants consistently cited unforeseen circumstances as the cause for these delays; however, the builder's defense often countered with claims of insufficient reasoning and late filings beyond the allowed time. This pattern suggests that one of the most common triggers for litigation in Vastushodh Erectors' cases is the dispute over adequate justification for delay extensions.

The reasons people brought cases to court primarily involve contesting the builder's stance on delay acceptability and the implications thereof. Applicants sought to overcome the builder's objections …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Vastushodh Erectors LLP, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around issues of delay condonation applications, where claimants sought additional time to present their cases properly, especially in engaging legal counsel and filing responses. This pattern indicates a recurring theme of procedural disputes rather than substantive claims regarding construction quality or project delivery.

The common reasons for initiating these cases appear to stem from a need for more time to navigate the legal complexities involved in responding to the builder's actions. Claimants often claim that they require additional time to adequately prepare and file their delay condonation applications. This reveals a potential lack of resources or preparedness on their part when entering into litigation with the builder.

On the other hand, Vastushodh Erectors LLP consistently emerged victorious in these cases due to a strong …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis