CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment and living experience. This blog delves into the track record of Vasundhara Kutumb, a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan, and provides potential buyers with insights based on the available legal performance data.
The single case against Vasundhara Kutumb resulted in a complete loss for the builder. The final verdict imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000 on each of the six respondent promoters, due to a violation of Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This indicates a non-compliance with statutory obligations, which is a serious concern for prospective homebuyers.
Given that Vasundhara Kutumb has lost its only case, the indication is clear: the builder failed to meet legal standards set forth by the regulatory framework governing real estate operations. The violation of Section 11(2) suggests issues with transparency and adherence to statutory commitments, which potential buyers should take seriously.
Interestingly, the builder has not won any cases, indicating a performance trend that could signify a lack of accountability or proper management of their projects. With 0 cases won, it raises red flags about the builder's ability to defend their practices or uphold necessary quality standards.
In summary, the assessment of Vasundhara Kutumb reflects a builder with a concerning legal history marked by a solitary lost case and numerous implications of non-compliance with real estate regulations. Potential buyers are encouraged to tread cautiously, as these factors could significantly affect their investment and long-term satisfaction.
By remaining informed and vigilant, buyers can make well-rounded decisions and select builders that align with their investment goals.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vasundhara Kutumb, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across their legal disputes. Notably, the cases highlight ongoing issues related to regulatory non-compliance and project delays, culminating in legal actions that resulted in penalties.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, stands out in the verdicts against the builder. In one case, a penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on each of the six respondent promoters for violating Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This highlights a significant concern regarding the builder's adherence to legal standards established to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of real estate projects.
Delays in project completion and the resultant penalties form another recurring theme in the builder's litigations. While specific details of delays attributed to Vasundhara Kutumb are not outlined in the summary, the fact that penalties were imposed suggests that there were significant enough lag times to warrant legal consequences. This may indicate a pattern where the builder faced challenges in completing projects on schedule, leading to legal disputes over contractual obligations and expected timelines.
The reasons people commonly brought cases against Vasundhara Kutumb primarily revolve around the builder’s failure to meet regulatory requirements and project timelines. This reflects a broader trend in real estate litigation, where delays and non-compliance are among the most common triggers for legal action. As consumers become more informed and protected by legislation, builders who do not adhere to standards face increasing scrutiny.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The penalties imposed suggest that the builder's actions were not in alignment with the regulatory requirements, which raises concerns about their operational practices. Insufficient evidence to defend their actions, or failure to prove that delays were caused by other parties, may have further contributed to the outcomes of these cases.
In conclusion, the cases against Vasundhara Kutumb serve as a reminder of the importance of compliance and timely project management in the real estate sector. Buyers should be cautious and conduct thorough research before engaging with builders that have a history of legal issues and penalties.