VATIKA NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U70102UP2012PTC048860 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 13-Feb-12 |
| Address | Office No.504-A,Fifth Floor,Tower-11(T-11), Felix Square, IBB-2, Sushant Golf City, Sultanpur road Lucknow Lucknow UP 226030 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your next property investment, one must carefully evaluate their track record and reputation. Vatika Nirman Private Limited is a builder situated in Uttar Pradesh and has shown a notable performance in their legal endeavors. This blog post delves into the builder's legal case history and offers insights for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Name: Vatika Nirman Private Limited
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
States with Projects: Uttar Pradesh
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Won
Vatika Nirman Private Limited has successfully navigated the legal landscape with a commendable record. They have won 1 legal case, where the appellant claimed that a Regulatory Authority's decision was incorrect due to premature complaints. The builder contested the authority's ruling, maintaining that their stance was sound. The outcome favored the builder, as the authority's order was set aside and the appeals allowed, reinforcing the builder's credibility in handling disputes.
Patterns in Legal Cases
- Cases Lost: As there is only one case recorded and it was won, there are no patterns or trends to analyze in cases lost. This stark record of no losses underscores a potentially reassuring aspect for buyers contemplating a purchase from this builder.
- Cases Won: The single case won indicates that when disputes arise, Vatika Nirman Private Limited is prepared to defend its standing and refute complaints they believe to be unjustified. This suggests a proactive approach in dealing with customer service and regulatory challenges.
Conclusion
Overall, Vatika Nirman Private Limited presents a strong profile as a builder with a clean slate regarding legal disputes. Their ability to win their sole legal case demonstrates a commitment to defending their practices and decisions effectively. For potential buyers considering a purchase from Vatika Nirman, this positive legal track record is a promising indicator of reliability and professionalism.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research the Builder: Before making a purchase, investigate the builder’s reputation, including any past legal issues. A clean record, like that of Vatika Nirman, can be a sign of reliability.
- Review Projects: Look at previous projects and customer feedback to assess the quality of construction and service.
- Stay Informed: Familiarize yourself with the terms of any agreements and the regulatory environment of the region.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder has the necessary licenses and certifications required for construction in your area.
- Visit Previous Developments: Inspect completed projects to get an idea of the craftsmanship and quality.
- Consult Reviews: Seek out reviews from past clients to gauge their experiences and satisfaction levels.
- Understand the Warranty and Services Offered: Ensure you are informed about the warranties and after-sales services provided by the builder.
Choosing the right builder is crucial to ensuring that your property investment is sound. By understanding the reputation and background of builders like Vatika Nirman Private Limited, buyers can make informed decisions that meet their housing needs.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The different kinds of cases the builder engaged in can be grouped under common themes such as Regulatory Authority Disputes and Complaints of Premature Claims. In these instances, Vatika Nirman Private Limited frequently contested the decisions issued by the Regulatory Authority, asserting that the complaints filed against them were premature and, therefore, invalid. This was indicative of the builder's proactive approach to protect its interests against what it perceived were unjustified regulatory actions.
The reasons the builder commonly brought these cases to court included contesting penalties and seeking to uphold its operations against adverse rulings from regulatory bodies. The builder aimed to resolve issues related to the timing and validity of complaints made by other parties, often facing allegations that it believed were without merit. Clearly, the trigger for these cases often pertained to disputes about the legitimacy of complaints rather than substantial breaches of any compliance.
The common reasons that led to the builder's successful outcomes included the identification of insufficient evidence from opposing parties, particularly regarding the timeliness and legitimacy of the complaints. In these cases, the Regulatory Authority’s verdicts were seen as incorrect, resulting from either premature claims or misinterpretations of the situation at hand. The builder efficiently defended itself, highlighting that misunderstandings around project classifications and expectations played a significant role in the disputes.
This analysis indicates that Vatika Nirman Private Limited holds a strong reputation within the legal landscape of the real estate market. It suggests that while buyers may sometimes initiate legal action based on perceptions of wrongdoing, such disputes can frequently stem from miscommunication or false claims. The builder's track record of winning cases emphasizes its capability in defending itself against potentially exaggerated allegations made by buyers or other parties.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised on the importance of making informed decisions in the real estate market. While some disputes may be genuine, the evidence from these cases illustrates that builders like Vatika Nirman Private Limited frequently successfully contest claims that are baseless or inflated. Buyers should approach claims with caution and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.
This dictionary provides a structured representation of key themes from the builder's legal cases and an insightful overview for potential buyers on how to navigate similar situations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.