CIN | U70102MP2009PTC022366 |
---|---|
Year Established | 09 September 2009 |
Address | 6 & 7 SHABRI COMPLEX M. P. NAGAR, ZONE II, NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA , BHOPAL, Madhya Pradesh, India - 462011 |
Company Status | Private |
In the bustling world of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount to ensuring a smooth home-buying experience. Today, we delve into Vatsals Infrabuild Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. With a limited but noteworthy legal history, it’s crucial to assess their standing based on the available data to help potential buyers make informed decisions.
The legal case involving Vatsals Infrabuild revolves around the non-completion of development work and failure to provide possession of a plot within the specified timeframe. The applicant claimed that these failures directly impacted their investment and timelines. Meanwhile, the builder responded by attributing the delays to unforeseen legal circumstances and other complications. The authority ruled in favor of the applicant, mandating that the builder complete the required work and deliver possession along with compensation to the affected party.
From the singular case that Vatsals Infrabuild lost, a clear pattern of unfulfilled commitments to buyers emerges. The complaint highlighted issues around delayed possession and incomplete work, common pain points many homebuyers face. The ruling emphasized the responsibility of the builder to adhere to scheduled timelines and service expectations. This could pose a red flag for potential clients regarding reliability.
Interestingly, despite the fact that Vatsals Infrabuild has lost the only official case documented, it should be noted that no cases have been won thus far. This indicates that Vatsals Infrabuild has not yet successfully defended their projects or actions in a legal context, which may raise concerns about their operational practices and ability to address customer grievances satisfactorily.
In summary, Vatsals Infrabuild Private Limited faces challenges regarding customer satisfaction and legal performance. With a documented history of a single complaint that resulted in a loss and no victories in legal proceedings, potential buyers may need to approach with caution. It is advisable for interested parties to conduct further research, preferably looking at customer reviews and ratings beyond legal issues.
By following these guidelines and remaining informed, buyers can better navigate the complexities of purchasing property and reduce the risks associated with builder engagements.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vatsals Infrabuild Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with applicants often citing failure to complete development work on time. The builder consistently defended its position by invoking unforeseen circumstances and legal issues as contributing factors to the delays. However, the outcomes suggest that these defenses were insufficient to meet the expectations set during the purchase agreements.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting the builder's inability to provide timely possession and completed development as promised. Applicants typically expressed frustration over the prolonged waiting period for their plots, which is a fundamental expectation when engaging in real estate purchases. The builder's recurrent reliance on unforeseen circumstances and legal issues to justify delays indicates a pattern of externalizing responsibility rather than addressing internal project management failures.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to its failure to fulfill contractual obligations regarding timely development and possession delivery. While the defenses presented sought to rationalize the delays, they did not align with the commitments made to the applicants. Furthermore, the legal framework governing real estate transactions typically mandates adherence to timelines and requirements; the builder's non-compliance with these regulations likely contributed significantly to the verdicts against them.
In conclusion, the analysis highlights the importance of transparency and adherence to timelines in the real estate sector. Builders must ensure that they can deliver on their promises, and applicants should be wary of builders with a history of delays or disputes. The patterns observed in Vatsals Infrabuild's cases serve as a reminder to potential buyers to conduct thorough research and consider past performance before making significant investments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6--87--49--4543 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Non-completion of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Himanshu Singh | Vatsal Infabuild Pr… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/109616968671.pdf |