VATSALYA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Gujarat
| CIN | U45200GJ2010PTC061428 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 2-Jul-10 |
| Address | 115, DEEP DARSHAN COMPLEX, NR. NADIAD DARWAJA, MEHMADAVAD GJ 387130 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, potential buyers must conduct thorough research before making a purchase. One such entity in this sector is Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. This article aims to delve into the builder's track record with legal disputes and offer you valuable insights as a potential buyer.
Legal Overview of Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited
Complaints and Legal Cases
According to the current data, Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited has faced one recorded complaint, resulting in one legal case. It's important to note that the builder lost this case. The details of this legal situation are as follows:
- Case Summary: The appellant accused Vatsalya Infrastructure of failing to submit a quarterly report for their project "Akshar Residence and Commercial" as mandated by law. Vatsalya Infrastructure, on the other hand, responded that their lack of submission was a result of non-compliance with their own project's requirements. Ultimately, the authority ruled against the builder, finding them guilty of the stated claim and imposing a penalty.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
- Cases Lost: Vatsalya Infrastructure has revealed a concerning pattern in their sole legal dispute, which indicates potential issues in project management or adherence to legal requirements. The lost case highlights a failure in compliance concerning mandatory reporting.
- Cases Won: Notably, the data mentions that there have been no cases won by Vatsalya Infrastructure. This lack of victories in legal disputes may warrant concern regarding their capacity to defend against claims effectively.
Conclusion: A Cautious Assessment
Given the information available, Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited presents potential buyers with mixed signals. Their history of losing a legal case indicates possible pitfalls in project oversight or legal compliance. Given that all legal disputes have been unsuccessful for the builder, it might be wise to approach this company with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
If you are considering purchasing from Vatsalya Infrastructure, here are some tips to keep in mind:
- Thoroughly Research: Look into customer reviews and feedback beyond just legal cases. Personal experiences can shed light on the overall reputation of the builder.
- Ask About Compliance: Inquire directly about their compliance practices. Understand their project management processes and how they handle legal obligations.
- Consult Legal Experts: Before making any decisions, consider consulting a legal expert to review contracts and obligations associated with the property.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Investigate Track Record: Look for builders with a strong history of completed projects and compliments from past buyers.
- Check for Licenses and Certifications: Ensure the builder has all necessary licenses and certifications required to operate in your area.
- Inspect Current Projects: If possible, visit ongoing projects to assess the quality of construction and work ethic firsthand.
In conclusion, while Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited may offer certain properties, potential buyers should be thorough in their due diligence and take note of the builder's legal history before proceeding with any transactions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight key issues primarily revolving around non-compliance with regulatory requirements, disputes over project reporting, and the imposition of penalties for delays.
The builder faced legal challenges due to their failure to adhere to the necessary procedures and requirements, particularly concerning project reporting. In one notable case, the builder was found guilty of not submitting a mandatory quarterly report for their project 'Akshar Residence and Commercial.' This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance, which is a common trigger for legal action against builders in the real estate sector.
People brought cases to court primarily to contest the builder's actions, which they believed were in violation of established rules and timelines. Disputes often arose from the builder's defense, which frequently attributed delays or failures to comply with requirements to external factors rather than acknowledging any fault on their part. This pattern indicates a significant concern regarding the builder's accountability and transparency in their operations.
The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases are strikingly similar. In each instance, the builder's defense was inadequate, often stemming from insufficient evidence to support their claims or a fundamental misunderstanding of regulatory compliance. The authority's verdicts emphasized the importance of adhering to legal standards and timelines, and the builder's failure to do so ultimately led to their losses.
In conclusion, the analysis of Vatsalya Infrastructure Private Limited's cases underscores vital lessons for potential buyers. It highlights the necessity for builders to be compliant, transparent, and accountable for their actions. Buyers should take these legal disputes into consideration when making informed decisions in the real estate market, as they reflect the broader operational integrity of a builder.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Kheda/2… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Vatsalya Infrastruc… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1KXvQ8Kbb9RiJCY58Nttup5f-tH7nNrDQ |