CIN | U45201KA2010PTC053386 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | VBHC House 74 & 75 Millers Road Vasanthnagar Bangalore Bangalore KA 560052 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
VBHC Delhi Value Homes Private Limited is a prominent name in the real estate sector, specifically noted for its projects in Rajasthan. While the builder has a range of satisfied customers, it is essential to assess their reputation through legal channels to understand more about their dealings and reliability. This blog delves into the company's legal history, analyzing complaints, verdicts, and patterns that may impact potential buyers' decisions.
Overview of Legal Complaints
The builder has faced a total of 5 complaints. Out of these, they successfully won 3 cases while losing 2 cases. This highlights a reasonable performance in legal disputes, combined with an active engagement in resolving issues through legal means.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Cases Won
Out of the 3 cases won by VBHC, two were cases filed by complainants who ultimately withdrew their claims or settled out of court, indicating a preference for mutual …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against VBHC Delhi Value Homes Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: refund and compensation claims, and settlement disputes.
The refund and compensation claims appear to be the most significant type of case, with plaintiffs often seeking refunds, interest on loans, and additional compensation. These claims typically arise from delays in project completion or dissatisfaction with the builder's performance. They highlight an underlying issue of trust between the builder and buyers, with plaintiffs frequently contesting penalties imposed by the builder or seeking redress for what they perceive as inadequate service.
Settlement disputes constitute another major theme, with cases often resolving through negotiations rather than escalating to a full trial. The summaries indicate that the builder was able to settle matters amicably on several occasions, suggesting an attempt by the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, VBHC Delhi Value Homes Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The types of cases primarily involve the withdrawal of complaints as well as disputes that have been resolved between the involved parties.
In the first instance, the builder's complaints were dismissed as withdrawn by the complainant, indicating that the initial claims lacked sufficient grounding. In another case, the parties settled their issues, showing that disputes may sometimes escalate unnecessarily, but can also be resolved amicably when both sides agree on terms.
The common reasons for the builder bringing these cases to court seem to revolve around the contestation of withdrawal by the complainants and clarifications regarding settled litigations. There appears to be a pattern in which disputes may arise due to misunderstandings or disagreements over the situation leading to the filings.
The reasons the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The primary disputes can be grouped into a few recurring themes: Refund Disputes, Regulatory Compliance, and Deposit Recoveries. Each theme reflects common grievances that arise between buyers and builders, often resulting in legal proceedings.
In the cases examined, the claims made by complainants predominantly revolved around demands for refunds of deposits made for flats in the VBHC Green Fields project. The opposing parties argued for refunds based on what they perceived as grievances with the project, essentially seeking recourse through the legal system. The builder's defense, however, consistently asserted that such refunds are not permitted under the provisions of the relevant real estate acts, leading to a significant dismissal of these claims by the regulatory authority.
The reasons behind these cases often stemmed from a misunderstanding or lack of awareness …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!