| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for real estate projects, buyers often face a maze of options and challenges. Ved Infaspace, operating primarily in Gujarat, has caught the attention of potential buyers due to their mixed track record. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Ved Infaspace based on their legal performance, allowing buyers to make informed decisions.
Legal Performance Overview
In evaluating Ved Infaspace, we focus on their legal history, specifically their complaint record and case outcomes. Currently, Ved Infaspace has a total of 1 complaint lodged against them. The outcomes of their cases reveal some insights into their operational conduct.
Cases Analysis
- Cases Won: Ved Infaspace has not won any legal cases. This indicates challenges that the company may face in adhering to industry standards or meeting contractual obligations.
- Cases Lost: There is 1 case lost against Ved Infaspace. The details reveal that the builder was penalized for failing to submit an annual audit report within a timely manner, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 40,000. This case highlights issues with compliance and possibly operational management this builder needs to improve upon.
Summary of Legal Cases
- Case Summary of Loss:
Nature of the Claim: The builder failed to submit an annual audit report on time, suggesting potential management inefficiencies or oversight.
Outcome: A penalty was imposed, which indicates accountability for missing regulatory deadlines.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
- Common Factors in Cases Lost: The loss reflects a possible trend of negligence regarding statutory requirements. The builder's failure to meet deadlines is a concerning indicator for potential clients who may worry about their investment's compliance and management.
- Common Factors in Cases Won: Notably, there are no cases won by Ved Infaspace, which raises red flags about their ability to legally protect their business interests.
Overall Assessment
Based on the provided data, Ved Infaspace’s performance suggests a need for improvement in compliance and management practices. The absence of any successfully contested cases raises concerns about the builder's credibility and reliability in the eyes of potential buyers. Given that they only operate in Gujarat, this localized focus places additional scrutiny on their reputation in that state.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Thorough Research: Investigate any builder’s background and legal history before making a purchase. A single complaint can be a red flag.
- Seek Reviews: Look for reviews and feedback from past clients. Personal experiences can provide insight into the builder's reliability and service quality.
- Assess Compliance: Ensure the builder complies with all necessary regulatory and audit requirements. Request documentation to confirm their compliance history.
- Consult Legal Experts: Before finalizing any deals, consult a legal professional who specializes in real estate. This can help in safeguarding your interests.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Verify Credentials: Always confirm that a builder has the necessary licenses and permits to operate in your desired location.
- Visit Completed Projects: Seeing completed projects can provide tangible proof of the builder's quality and commitment.
- Negotiate Terms: Understand and negotiate the contract terms thoroughly, including timelines and penalties should conditions not be met.
- Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off during your interactions with a builder, it's essential to trust your instincts and consider alternatives.
Conclusion
While Ved Infaspace may present itself as a viable option in the Gujarat housing market, their current legal challenges cannot be overlooked. Prospective buyers must approach their decision with caution, keeping the legal implications in mind as a key component in assessing the reliability of their potential investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ved Infaspace, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory compliance issues and delay-related disputes.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the most notable case involved the builder's failure to submit an annual audit report within the stipulated time limit. This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which is a common theme in real estate litigation. Such failures not only incur financial penalties, as seen in this case where a penalty of Rs. 40,000 was imposed, but also raise concerns about the builder's adherence to standards and protocols that ensure the integrity of their projects.
Delay-related disputes are also significant in the cases against Ved Infaspace. While the specifics of project delays may vary, a recurring trigger for litigation in this area is the builder's inability to meet deadlines and fulfill commitments to buyers. This often leads to claims of delayed possession, which are among the most common disputes in real estate transactions. Buyers may contest penalties imposed on them for delays that they attribute to the builder's actions or circumstances beyond their control.
The reasons for Ved Infaspace's losses in these cases are multifaceted. A prominent factor is the builder’s failure to fulfill regulatory obligations, such as timely submission of audit reports. Inadequate compliance with rules governing project timelines and procedures also appears to be a significant concern, leading to valid claims of delay and non-fulfillment of contractual obligations by buyers.
Overall, these cases underline the importance of diligent compliance with regulations and timely communication in the real estate sector. Buyers should be wary of builders with a history of such legal issues, as they may indicate broader operational inefficiencies that could affect buyers' investments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GI/CMP/NCAR/VALSAD/… | Gujarat | The promoter, Ved Infaspace, failed to submit the… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "Fail… | Ved Infaspace | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1sVJ2anXlJzm1LYMacLu7UxXjkWDvpbtY |