| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction to Ved Infratech
In the dynamic world of real estate, understanding the reliability of builders is paramount for potential homeowners. This post delves into Ved Infratech, a builder operating in Gujarat, examining their legal track record and providing insights for prospective buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
Ved Infratech has a total of one complaint against them, which is a relatively low number in comparison to many builders in the industry. However, it is essential to note that they have won 0 cases against this single complaint, meaning they have lost the case that was brought against them.
Details of the Legal Case
In the case filed against Ved Infratech, the complainant claimed that the builder did not provide possession of the flat and failed to refund the amount paid despite multiple requests. On the other hand, the builder claimed that the complainant had not paid the remaining amount, asserting that the project was delayed due to various reasons beyond their control.
Final Verdict: The authority ordered Ved Infratech to pay the amount owed to the complainant, along with interest and expenses. This outcome highlights a failure on the part of the builder to meet their obligations, ultimately affecting their reputation.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Common Factors in Cases Lost
The solitary case lost by Ved Infratech illustrates some common issues that often lead to negative outcomes for builders:
- Failure to Deliver Possession: The primary complaint noted that the possession of the property was not provided, indicating possible management or operational inefficiencies.
- Refund Issues: The builder's failure to process refunds despite multiple requests signals potential financial issues or inadequate customer service practices.
Common Factors in Cases Won
Interestingly, Ved Infratech has not won any cases, suggesting a significant gap in their ability to defend against customer claims, which could raise red flags about their operational practices and customer relations approach.
Conclusion and Assessment of Ved Infratech
In summary, Ved Infratech exhibits some concerning signs related to customer satisfaction and legal reliability. Having lost the only case filed against them raises questions about their commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations. For potential buyers considering properties from Ved Infratech, it is crucial to exercise caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before committing to a purchase, investigate the builder's reputation, focusing on reviews from previous customers and any legal histories.
- Seek Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear timelines and processes for the project, including possession dates and payment structures.
- Demand Documentation: Always ask for written confirmations of key agreements and timelines to safeguard your interests.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Licenses and Certifications: Ensure that the builder is legally recognized and certified to operate in the region.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder’s completed projects to gauge construction quality and suitability.
- Get Legal Assistance: Consider hiring a real estate lawyer to review contracts before making a commitment.
By taking these precautions and conducting thorough due diligence, homebuyers can better navigate the sometimes tumultuous waters of the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ved Infratech, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment and refunds.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers that the builder failed to provide possession of their flats on time, despite having made substantial payments. The builder, in their defense, often counters with assertions that the delay was due to various reasons beyond their control and that buyers had not fulfilled their payment obligations. However, the legal authorities did not accept these defenses, emphasizing the importance of adhering to timelines and contractual commitments in real estate transactions.
A common trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder's inability to meet project deadlines, which led buyers to question the status of their investments and seek refunds or compensation for the delay. The builder's repeated failure to provide clear timelines for completion or to address buyer concerns appears to have undermined trust and prompted legal action.
The outcomes of these cases suggest that Ved Infratech lost due to a combination of factors, primarily revolving around insufficient evidence to support their claims of extenuating circumstances, and a lack of compliance with the agreed-upon terms of sale. The authorities observed that the builder did not validate their defenses with robust evidence, leading to a series of rulings against them.
In conclusion, the cases against Ved Infratech serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers regarding the importance of thorough due diligence and ensuring that builders are committed to fulfilling their contractual obligations on time. Buyers should be vigilant and proactive in their approach when engaging with builders, especially in a market where delays and disputes are not uncommon.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/Offline/Vapi/19… | Gujarat | The complainant, Smt. Varshaben Vijaykumar Patil,… | ["Non-delivery of f… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Smt. Varshaben Vija… | Ved Infratech | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1nRgMj48GefX0FZE3DN0w9J9UWs0xgGJ2 |