CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive landscape of real estate in India, potential homebuyers often grapple with the reliability of builders. One such builder is VGN Developers Private Limited, operating in Tamil Nadu. This post aims to dissect the builder's legal standing by examining its complaint history and cases won or lost, offering insights for potential buyers.
VGN Developers Private Limited has encountered a total of one complaint. The details of this case reveal a nuanced situation that reflects both the builder's challenges and responses.
VGN Developers Private Limited's legal record, albeit sparse, raises significant questions about their operational reliability. With one complaint resulting in the builder being directed to expedite their construction process, potential buyers should approach with caution. Here are some tips for evaluating this builder:
In conclusion, while VGN Developers has shown some capability in managing projects, their track record warrants caution. By performing due diligence and following best practices when selecting a builder, prospective homebuyers can make informed decisions that best suit their needs.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against VGN Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Construction Without Consent, and Regulatory Compliance Issues.
The most prominent theme was Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers sought timely possession of their flats. In one notable case, a complainant alleged that the builder had delayed possession of his flat while also constructing additional floors without his consent. The builder's defense centered around a claimed delay due to the Enforcement Directorate's attachment of their property, asserting that more than 80% of the construction was complete. However, the authority ruled against the builder, mandating the completion and handover of the flat by a specified date.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases primarily revolved around delays attributed to factors beyond the builder's control, disputes over construction actions taken without adequate consent, and regulatory compliance issues. Buyers were often triggered to take legal action when they felt that the builder had misrepresented the timeline for possession or had unilaterally made significant changes to the property.
The builder's losses in these cases could be attributed to several factors. While the builder might have had valid defenses, such as the Enforcement Directorate's involvement, the ruling often emphasized the importance of adhering to timelines and securing proper consent for modifications. This suggests that either the builder's evidence was insufficient to justify the delays and actions taken or that there were underlying compliance issues that negatively affected the outcomes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
034/2021 | Tamil Nadu | The complainant sought possession of his flat in … | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought posse… | ThiruL.K.Segar | VGN Developers Priv… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2021/34-2021.pdf |