No Logo Available

VGN PROJECTS ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINU70102TN2008PTC066788
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressY-222, VGN Kimberly Towers, 2nd Avenue, Anna Nagar Chennai Chennai TN 600040 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic landscape of real estate, understanding the track record of builders is crucial for potential homebuyers. This blog post delves into the performance and legal history of VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, a builder primarily active in Tamil Nadu.

Overview of VGN Projects Estates Private Limited

VGN Projects Estates Private Limited has been involved in the creation of housing projects in Tamil Nadu. However, their legal history raises some concerns worth discussing for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Insights

Cases Filed

VGN Projects has faced legal scrutiny, with a total of 1 complaint registered against the builder. The key details of this legal case are summarized below:

  • Complainant's Claim: The complainant sought possession of a flat and compensation for delays in possession.
  • Builder's Response: The builder contended that the complainant had only settled 75% of the total payment due and requested the balance payment before handing …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Payment Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Payment Disputes.

In the case of Delayed Possession Claims, the complainant sought possession of the flat and compensation for the delay in handing over the possession. This indicates a growing concern among buyers regarding the builder's ability to adhere to timelines and fulfill their commitments.

Payment Disputes revolve around the balance payment due from the buyer, which the builder claimed was essential for handing over possession. The authority's verdict emphasized the importance of adhering to the construction agreement, ensuring that possession would be granted once any outstanding balance was settled.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over payment requirements. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review