Analysis of the cases filed against Vighnaharta Developers that it lost reveals several key insights into the builder's legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: regulatory compliance issues and delay-related penalties.

The first type of cases involves regulatory compliance issues, particularly concerning the builder's obligation to maintain transparency in its operations. For instance, the builder was fined for failing to submit quarterly reports on time, highlighting a pattern of non-compliance with legal requirements. This raises concerns about the builder's adherence to other regulatory obligations, potentially indicating a systemic issue within the company.

The second theme revolves around delay-related penalties, which suggests that the builder may have faced challenges in completing projects on schedule. While the provided summary does not detail cases of delayed possession or project completion, the penalty for non-compliance with reporting requirements could imply broader operational inefficiencies that might impact project timelines.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and operational delays. The builder may have disputed the severity of the fines or argued that the delays were beyond its control; however, the outcomes suggest that such defenses were inadequate.

The builder's losses in these cases likely stem from insufficient evidence to support its claims of compliance or extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, a failure to adhere to legal or regulatory requirements, such as timely report submissions, directly contributed to the verdicts against them. This underlines the importance of procedural compliance and transparency in the real estate sector.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Vighnaharta Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary themes of disputes arose from challenges related to regulatory compliance, specifically the registration of projects with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). Complaints frequently centered on allegations that the builder had not registered the 8-block project, with opposing parties seeking relief for this supposed non-compliance.

These cases stemmed from several common reasons: parties disputing alleged failures to comply with regulatory mandates, particularly claims focused on project registration. Buyers or regulatory bodies often filed complaints citing concerns that builders were not adhering to legal requirements, thereby necessitating court intervention to address these perceived violations.

Upon examining the reasons for Vighnaharta Developers' victories, it's evident that there were significant factors at play. In these cases, the builder effectively argued that their projects were completed prior to the enactment of the RERA Act, thus exempting them from the need for registration. Furthermore, the authority dismissed complaints on jurisdictional grounds, indicating that claims made were not within the authority's remit to adjudicate. This suggests that many claims brought forth by the complainants lacked the necessary legal foundation to succeed.

From this analysis, we garner valuable insights into the builder's reputation and the broader real estate market dynamics. It is important to understand that sometimes, buyers may file complaints based on misunderstandings or exaggerated claims. Vighnaharta Developers demonstrated a robust capacity to defend against unjust allegations, underlying their commitment to adhering to the law and maintaining their standards.

In conclusion, potential buyers should remember the importance of making informed decisions in the real estate market. The analysis of these cases illustrates that while legitimate disputes certainly exist, builders like Vighnaharta Developers have demonstrated a strong record of defending themselves against unfounded accusations. Buyers are encouraged to approach claims carefully, considering the full context and seeking reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.