VIHAV SKYVAN

Introduction

When selecting a builder for your dream home, it's critical to understand their track record and reputation. In this post, we take a deep dive into Vihav Skyvan, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. With only one complaint against them, the analysis of their legal history can provide valuable insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Vihav Skyvan's Complaint History

Vihav Skyvan has a legal track record that includes dealing with one complaint, which they ultimately lost. This indicates that there may be concerns regarding an aspect of their business practices. An important facet here is the violation related to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Legal Case Details

In the case filed against Vihav Skyvan, the appellant claimed that:

• Violations: The builder failed to display the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) website in their advertisement, which is a requirement under the Act.

In their defense, Vihav Skyvan claimed that they had included the RERA registration number and website in their prospectus but simply omitted the website from the advertisement in question.

Despite their defense, the authority ruled against Vihav Skyvan, resulting in a fine of Rs. 50,000.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

Analyzing the sole case lost, we note the following common factors:

• Regulatory Compliance: A failure to fully comply with advertising regulations posed an issue for Vihav Skyvan. The omission of the RERA website in their advertisement showcases a lapse in ensuring all legal requirements were met, which potentially erodes consumer trust.

Cases Won

While Vihav Skyvan has not won any cases, it’s important to note that they have only faced one complaint thus far. However, their claim indicates a potential pattern of attempting to comply with regulatory requirements, though their execution fell short in this instance.

Conclusion

Overall, Vihav Skyvan's current standing reflects a delicate balance. With only one complaint resulting in a lost case, it suggests that while there is a willingness to engage with regulatory practices, there is room for improvement in adherence to all aspects of compliance. Potential buyers should approach with caution, given the builder's existing track record.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s reputation and read any available reviews or testimonials from previous clients.
2. Ask About Compliance: Inquire about how the builder ensures compliance with RERA and other regulations, especially in advertising.
3. Request Documentation: Always ask for documentation that backs up the claims made by the builder, such as certifications or compliance records.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check for Complaints: Review any complaints or legal cases against the builder; understanding their outcomes can provide insight into their practices.
• Assess Communication: Evaluate how responsive the builder is to inquiries. A builder's willingness to communicate openly can be a good indicator of reliability.
• Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder's completed projects to assess quality, craftsmanship, and customer satisfaction.

In conclusion, while Vihav Skyvan operates in the real estate market with a measured presence, potential buyers should conduct due diligence before entering into any agreements. Making informed decisions can lead to a successful and satisfying purchase experience.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Vihav Skyvan, which it lost, revealed several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered in real estate transactions. The cases highlight key themes surrounding regulatory compliance and the imposition of penalties for deviations from established norms.

The primary theme observed in the cases involves regulatory non-compliance, particularly in relation to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In one notable case, the builder was fined for failing to display the RERA website in their advertisement, which is a mandatory requirement to ensure transparency and provide potential buyers with access to important information. This highlights a pattern where builders may prioritize promotional strategies over legal obligations, leading to legal repercussions.

Penalties for violations emerge as a natural consequence of non-compliance. Builders found in breach of regulatory requirements often face financial penalties, as seen in the case where Vihav Skyvan was fined Rs. 50,000. The imposition of such penalties serves to enforce compliance within the real estate sector and protect the interests of prospective buyers.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include the builder’s failure to adhere to legal standards and the regulatory framework established by RERA. Builders may contest penalties, arguing for mitigating circumstances or claiming compliance based on alternative forms of disclosure, such as including information in prospectuses rather than advertisements. However, the underlying factor in the builder’s losses relates to insufficient adherence to the clear requirements outlined by RERA, leading to a consistent pattern of legal defeats.