builder logo

VIIJCON PROPERTIES

  • No of Complaints: 2
  • States (Active in): Karnataka
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

When considering a property purchase, it's essential to conduct thorough due diligence on builders and developers. In the realm of real estate, potential buyers must analyze the track record of builders to make informed decisions. In this article, we delve into VIIJCON PROPERTIES, a builder operating in Karnataka, exploring its legal challenges and offering insights for potential buyers.

Overview of VIIJCON PROPERTIES

VIIJCON PROPERTIES has faced a total of two complaints, both resulting in losses for the builder. These legal battles highlight significant issues related to project completion and possession delays, prompting questions about the builder’s reliability and commitment to fulfilling its obligations.

Legal Case Summaries

  1. Delayed Project Completion: In the first case, the complainant claimed that VIIJCON PROPERTIES did not complete the project on time and sought a refund of their investment. The builder contended that the delays were caused by factors beyond their control; however, the RERA authority ruled in favor of the complainant, ordering the developer to refund the amount with interest.
  2. Possession Delay and Compensation: In the second case, the issue was the delayed possession of a flat, with the complainant asking for monetary compensation. VIIJCON PROPERTIES argued that the work was progressing rapidly and that the compensation demanded was excessive. Despite this defense, the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the complainant, mandating the builder to compensate at a rate of 10.75% annually on the total amount paid until the possession is delivered.

Patterns in Legal Challenges

Common Factors in Lost Cases:

  • Project Delays: Both cases stemmed from delays in project completion and possession, indicating a troubling trend in the builder’s ability to adhere to timelines.
  • Financial Repercussions: The outcomes of these legal disputes resulted in financial liabilities for VIIJCON PROPERTIES, which may affect its financial health and future project delivery.

Factors Noted in Mild Defenses:

  • External Circumstances: The builder's defense relied on citing unforeseen circumstances as causes for the delays, suggesting a potential lack of proactive project management.
  • Claims of Progress: In at least one instance, the builder claimed that the work was underway, hinting at possible communication issues between the builder and buyers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, prospective buyers should approach VIIJCON PROPERTIES with caution. The builder's history of losing legal cases surrounding project delays raises significant concerns regarding reliability and project management. Buyers should thoroughly scrutinize all available information, looking for red flags such as customer complaints, legal disputes, and overall project delivery timelines.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Due Diligence: Research the builder's history of complaints and litigation. Look for reviews from past customers and current project statuses.
  2. Check Project Timelines: Ensure that the builder has a concrete plan for project completion with clear milestones.
  3. Engage Legal Advice: Before making any purchases, consult a legal expert to understand the terms and conditions involved, focusing on flexibility, penalties for delays, and other contract specifics.

General Tips for Buyers Selecting Builders

  • Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered with statutory bodies like RERA and has a good standing there.
  • Seek Recommendations: Word of mouth can be invaluable; ask friends or family for recommendations based on their experiences.
  • Request Documentation: Transparency is key. Request all relevant documents, such as completion certificates, project brochures, and financial statements.

Being informed and prepared can protect your interests and help you make wise investment choices in the real estate market.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Project Completion Delays Refund and Compensation Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against VIIJCON PROPERTIES, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession of flats and project completion delays, highlighting significant concerns in fulfilling contractual obligations on time.

The first type of cases involves Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, the complainants often cited delays in the delivery of their purchased flats and sought compensation for these delays. For instance, one complainant sought compensation due to the developer's failure to provide possession as per the promised timeline, leading the adjudicating officer to direct the builder to pay delay compensation at the rate of 10.75% p.a.

Another recurring theme is Project Completion Delays, where the builder was unable to complete projects within the stipulated timelines. Complainants sought refunds based on the developer’s inability to complete the project on schedule, asserting that the delays were not justified by circumstances beyond the builder's control. The RERA authority ruled in favor of the complainants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's defense of circumstance-induced delays.

Refund and Compensation Disputes also stand out as a major theme. Complainants not only sought refunds due to delayed project completions but also argued over the appropriateness of the compensation amounts proposed by the builder. This highlights a significant area of mistrust between the builder and its clients regarding financial settlements and remedies for delays.

The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily revolve around the builder's inability to meet deadlines, failure to communicate adequate justifications for delays, and disagreements over compensation amounts. The builder's repeated losses in these cases suggest systemic issues in project management and compliance with regulatory requirements, which likely contributed to the outcomes.

The builder's defense consistently cited external factors beyond their control for the delays. However, the legal authorities did not accept this defense, indicating that VIIJCON PROPERTIES might have failed to provide sufficient evidence to support these claims or did not adhere to established regulations governing real estate development. Such failures not only hinder the builder's operations but also strain building trust with current and potential clients.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
CMP/190408/0002597 Karnataka The complainant, Sandeep, filed a complaint again… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Sandeep Vijcon Properties https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=369471
CMP/190331/0002518 Karnataka The complainant sought refund of his amount from … ["Refund", "Project… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Shirish Patel Vijcon Properties https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=586287

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins