CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a property purchase, it's essential to conduct thorough due diligence on builders and developers. In the realm of real estate, potential buyers must analyze the track record of builders to make informed decisions. In this article, we delve into VIIJCON PROPERTIES, a builder operating in Karnataka, exploring its legal challenges and offering insights for potential buyers.
VIIJCON PROPERTIES has faced a total of two complaints, both resulting in losses for the builder. These legal battles highlight significant issues related to project completion and possession delays, prompting questions about the builder’s reliability and commitment to fulfilling its obligations.
In conclusion, prospective buyers should approach VIIJCON PROPERTIES with caution. The builder's history of losing legal cases surrounding project delays raises significant concerns regarding reliability and project management. Buyers should thoroughly scrutinize all available information, looking for red flags such as customer complaints, legal disputes, and overall project delivery timelines.
Being informed and prepared can protect your interests and help you make wise investment choices in the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against VIIJCON PROPERTIES, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession of flats and project completion delays, highlighting significant concerns in fulfilling contractual obligations on time.
The first type of cases involves Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, the complainants often cited delays in the delivery of their purchased flats and sought compensation for these delays. For instance, one complainant sought compensation due to the developer's failure to provide possession as per the promised timeline, leading the adjudicating officer to direct the builder to pay delay compensation at the rate of 10.75% p.a.
Another recurring theme is Project Completion Delays, where the builder was unable to complete projects within the stipulated timelines. Complainants sought refunds based on the developer’s inability to complete the project on schedule, asserting that the delays were not justified by circumstances beyond the builder's control. The RERA authority ruled in favor of the complainants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's defense of circumstance-induced delays.
Refund and Compensation Disputes also stand out as a major theme. Complainants not only sought refunds due to delayed project completions but also argued over the appropriateness of the compensation amounts proposed by the builder. This highlights a significant area of mistrust between the builder and its clients regarding financial settlements and remedies for delays.
The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily revolve around the builder's inability to meet deadlines, failure to communicate adequate justifications for delays, and disagreements over compensation amounts. The builder's repeated losses in these cases suggest systemic issues in project management and compliance with regulatory requirements, which likely contributed to the outcomes.
The builder's defense consistently cited external factors beyond their control for the delays. However, the legal authorities did not accept this defense, indicating that VIIJCON PROPERTIES might have failed to provide sufficient evidence to support these claims or did not adhere to established regulations governing real estate development. Such failures not only hinder the builder's operations but also strain building trust with current and potential clients.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/190408/0002597 | Karnataka | The complainant, Sandeep, filed a complaint again… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Sandeep | Vijcon Properties | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=369471 |
CMP/190331/0002518 | Karnataka | The complainant sought refund of his amount from … | ["Refund", "Project… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Shirish Patel | Vijcon Properties | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=586287 |