CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the real estate market, understanding the reputation and legal history of builders is crucial for homebuyers. This blog aims to provide an insightful overview of Vikash Green Infratech Private Limited, focusing on its legal track record and what potential buyers should consider.
By taking these measures, prospective homeowners can make informed choices and safeguard their investments, particularly when dealing with builders like Vikash Green Infratech Private Limited.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vikash Green Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into penalties for project delays, non-compliance with municipal orders, and disputes over project requirements.
The first type of case involves penalties imposed on the builder for delays in completing projects or uploading the required Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs). This highlights a recurring issue where builders may face legal action due to insufficient adherence to project timelines and reporting obligations.
The second category encompasses cases related to the builder's failure to comply with municipal orders or other regulatory requirements. Although specific details of the claims and defenses in these cases remain unspecified, it is important to note that non-compliance with local authority rulings typically results in legal consequences, as seen here.
The third theme revolves around disputes concerning project requirements, which could include anything from the builder's obligations regarding construction quality, project features, and adherence to agreed-upon specifications. The exact nature of the disputes in this case remains vague; however, it's clear that there were unresolved issues that prompted legal action.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting penalty charges, disputing delay attributions, and disagreements over project compliance. Notably, the builder's cases often seem to stem from a failure to fulfill obligations, whether related to timely project completion or adherence to established regulations.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to factors like non-compliance with legal requirements, as evidenced by the penalties imposed, and likely insufficient evidence to defend their actions or contest the charges effectively. The direct mention of a penalty in the final verdict highlights the serious nature of these violations and the legal system's enforcement of accountability in the construction sector.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["Non-filing of Qua… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Vikash Green Infrat… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/136-of-2024-1.pdf |