| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, understanding their track record is crucial. Vinayak Infrastructure, primarily operating in Gujarat, presents an interesting case for potential home buyers. This blog post analyzes the builder's legal history, diving into complaints, case outcomes, and offers insights for prospective clients.
Legal Case Overview
Vinayak Infrastructure has one recorded complaint against them. The nature of the complaint revolved around the builder's alleged failure to register a project with the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), which is a legal requirement under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.
Details of the Complaint
- Appellant Claim: The complaint stemmed from the appellant's assertion that Vinayak Infrastructure had not complied with the necessary project registration regulations.
- Respondent Claim: In response, Vinayak Infrastructure argued that their non-registration was not a willful violation but rather a case of negligence. They acknowledged liability but contended that …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Vinayak Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory compliance disputes and negligence penalty claims.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the most notable case involved the builder's failure to register their project with the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Gujarat RERA). This raised concerns about the builder's adherence to legal standards and their responsibility to uphold regulatory requirements. Cases in this theme often revolve around the financial penalties imposed on builders for non-compliance, which serves as a deterrent to prevent similar violations in the future.
The second theme, negligence and penalty claims, overlaps somewhat with regulatory compliance. However, it specifically focuses on instances where the builder was found to be negligent rather than willfully non-compliant. In the cited case, the builder contested the penalty by claiming it was due to negligence …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!