No Logo Available

VIPUL LIMITED

3.9/5 (137 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana, Odisha
CINL65923DL2002PLC167607
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressUnit No 201, C–50, Malviya Naagr New Delhi DL 110017 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate, customer trust and satisfaction play a significant role in sustaining a builder's reputation. VIPUL LIMITED, active in Haryana and Odisha, has a mixed record with numerous legal disputes that raise concerns among potential buyers. With a total of 137 complaints filed against them, it becomes crucial to analyze the nature of these disputes to offer insights for future homebuyers.

Overview of VIPUL LIMITED

VIPUL LIMITED has faced a significant number of complaints (137), resulting in 126 losses in court cases compared to only 11 wins. This notable imbalance raises questions about the builder's practices and how they handle project deliveries and customer satisfaction.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Factors in Cases Lost by VIPUL LIMITED

  1. Failure to Complete Projects on Time: Many of the complaints centered around the builder not delivering possession of flats within the stipulated period. For instance, several …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Project Completion and Handover Penalties for Project Delays Refund and Compensation Claims Disputes over Maintenance and Amenities

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Real Estate Regulations Disputes over Refunds Claims Related to Interest Calculations

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder VIPUL LIMITED, in which it lost, reveals significant insights into the nature of its disputes and the factors contributing to its legal challenges.

Delayed Possession Claims

A notable theme in the cases involves claims of delayed possession. The builder frequently contended that development works were completed and occupation certificates were applied for, yet faced counterclaims from respondents alleging that the units were not delivered as per agreed timelines. These disputes often resulted in orders for refunds along with interest for the delayed units, indicating a systemic failure in timely project delivery.

Non-compliance with Real Estate Regulations

Several cases highlighted the builder's struggle with compliance, particularly concerning the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. The builder consistently claimed adherence but faced opposing assertions that they failed to meet necessary legal standards. Such non-compliance resulted in dismissals of appeals, stressing …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Regulatory Compliance Disputes Penalty Payment Procedures

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes that emerged from these cases can be grouped into three main themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Compliance Disputes, and Penalty Payment Procedures.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: In one instance, the builder faced a claim regarding the timing of possession. The builder successfully argued that possession was offered within the statutory period, and the occupation certificate was issued on time, which the investigating commissioner corroborated. This sheds light on the importance of having robust documentation and clear communication when it comes to property handovers.
  2. Regulatory Compliance Disputes: Another case revolved around an order from the ld. Authority. The builder contested this order, claiming it was erroneous. The appeal was successful, resulting in the order being set aside and remanded for retrial. This demonstrates the builder's proactive stance in ensuring …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes Over Refunds Execution of Prior Orders Regulatory Compliance Claims of Mismanagement of Funds

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, VIPUL LIMITED, which resulted in victories for the builder, revealed notable themes and patterns in disputes.

The first common theme observed is "Disputes Over Refunds." Several cases revolved around claims for refunds by buyers who alleged that amounts paid for properties were improperly withheld or mismanaged. Despite these claims, VIPUL LIMITED successfully defended itself by demonstrating that payments had been made or that the claims were unfounded.

Another recurring theme is related to the "Execution of Prior Orders." The builder faced several applications insisting on the enforcement of earlier orders that favored the buyers. In these instances, the builder was able to showcase compliance with the orders, leading to dismissals of claims, particularly when the complainant had received settlements.

The third theme revolves around "Regulatory Compliance." Here, the builder was able to illustrate that it had acted …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review