CIN | U45201UP2005PTC030895 |
---|---|
Year Established | 26 October 2005 |
Address | 55 PURANA KILA , LUCKNOW, Uttar Pradesh, India - 226001 |
Company Status | Private |
When it comes to selecting a builder for your new home or investment project, understanding their history and legal standing is crucial. Today, we delve into the legal track record of Viraj Constructions Private Limited, a builder active in Uttar Pradesh. With only one complaint on record and a 100% success rate in legal cases, what can potential buyers take away from this information?
With a total of one registered complaint and a successful resolution in their only legal case, Viraj Constructions Private Limited appears to maintain a commendable legal standing. For potential buyers, this exemplary track record hints at a builder that likely prioritizes client relations and strives to uphold their contractual commitments.
In conclusion, while the track record of Viraj Constructions is positive, it is essential for buyers to do thorough research and, when possible, consult with experts when embarking on a significant investment such as real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Viraj Constructions Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes, each representing key areas of dispute. Among these, 'Delayed Possession Claims' highlight situations where the builder faced challenges related to possession timelines, while 'Disputes over Regulatory Compliance' often involved contested municipal orders or compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Furthermore, 'Land Classification Disputes' were frequent, indicating disagreements over the classification or conversion of land. Lastly, there were instances involving 'Contractual Disputes and Penalties', where the builder challenged fines or penalties attributed to delays or other contractual obligations.
The reasons behind the builder commonly bringing these cases to court varied, but frequent triggers included contesting penalties imposed for alleged delays, disputing claims of project delays that were often attributed to external factors, and challenges regarding land classification issues. These patterns illustrate the builder's proactive approach in defending its interests and ensuring that claims are appropriately contested.
In examining the common reasons for the builder's success in these cases, several factors stand out. A routine theme was the insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties, which may have failed to substantiate their claims. Moreover, instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory mandates by the other parties played a significant role, as did situations where opposing parties did not adhere to interim directions. Furthermore, misunderstandings regarding land or project classification rules often worked in favor of the builder, showcasing their effective legal defense against potentially exaggerated or unfounded claims.
This analysis lends insight into Viraj Constructions Private Limited's reputation in the broader real estate market. It becomes evident that while there are legitimate disputes in real estate, buyers can sometimes make false accusations against builders, which can lead to drawn-out legal battles. Remarkably, Viraj Constructions has demonstrated a strong capacity to defend itself against such unjust claims, reinforcing its standing as a resolute player in the industry.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach the real estate market with a critical lens and make informed decisions. Although disputes are an integral aspect of the sector, the record of builders like Viraj Constructions Private Limited illustrates that they can often triumph in litigation, especially against unmerited allegations. It is crucial for buyers to seek reliable information and thoroughly evaluate claims before forming opinions on a builder's reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TA-2247/2023 | Uttar Pradesh | The respondent's application for early hearing wa… | ["Rejection of appl… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | VIRAJ CONSTRUCTIONS… | PRAMILA RAL | ['https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy83NTI5NDAyMjQ3LTIwMjMucGRm'] |