VISHWANATH CONSTRUCTION KP LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Vishwanath Construction KP Limited is a builder that operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh. Like many construction companies, it has navigated its share of legal challenges, culminating in one recorded complaint. This article delves into the builder's legal track record, examining patterns in its cases and offering insights to potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
The builder has faced a total of one complaint, resulting in one lost case and no victories. The details of the legal dispute are as follows:
- Appellant's Claim: The applicant asserted that the builder failed to provide possession of the flat as promised and demanded an additional amount on top of what had already been paid.
- Respondent's Claim: In contrast, the builder contended that possession was withheld due to the applicant not having paid the complete amount owed.
- Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the applicant, ordering the builder to pay Rs. 2.00 lakh and provide possession of the flat within 30 days.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Patterns in Cases Lost
Looking at the solitary case lost by Vishwanath Construction KP Limited, a notable pattern emerges. The loss appears to stem from a failure to provide contracted services—in this case, the possession of a flat. This situation indicates potential issues regarding customer satisfaction and project completion timelines, which can be critical factors for potential homebuyers.
Patterns in Cases Won
Conversely, the builder has no recorded wins in legal disputes. This suggested the effectiveness of the complaints raised by customers against them, highlighting a consistent pattern of dissatisfaction from clients. It is crucial for potential buyers to note this aspect and consider the implications of engaging with a builder that has not successfully defended its practices in court.
Conclusion
Overall Assessment
Vishwanath Construction KP Limited has a significant legal concern that potential buyers should be aware of. With one complaint leading to a verdict against the builder, and no territories of successful defense, it's essential to exercise caution when considering a deal with them. Buyers may want to seek clarity on project progress, payment terms, and timelines before making any commitments.
Tips for Potential Buyers
1. Do Your Research: Investigate the builder's reputation and review any available customer feedback.
2. Understand Payment Plans: Clarify the payment structure and ensure that no undue costs become an issue during or after construction.
3. Seek Binding Contracts: Ensure your agreement defines project timelines and milestones clearly.
4. Legal Consultation: If possible, consult a legal expert before committing to any deals.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure the builder possesses all necessary licenses and approvals required by local authorities.
- Visit Finished Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to assess quality and craftsmanship.
- Understand Possible Risks: Be aware of the risks associated with construction projects, including delays and additional costs.
- Get Everything in Writing: Never rely on verbal agreements—ensure all terms are documented.
With diligence and caution, potential buyers can navigate their home-buying journey successfully.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vishwanath Construction KP Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Payment Disputes.
In the case of Delayed Possession Claims, the applicant often cited the builder's failure to provide possession of the promised property on time. This was frequently tied to demands for additional payments, which suggests that buyers felt aggrieved when their expectations for timely possession were not met, particularly when they were asked to pay more beforehand.
Payment Disputes were another common theme, where the builder would claim that the buyer had not paid the full amount owed, and thus possession was withheld. However, the legal outcome in the summarized case indicates that withholding possession for payment disputes may not be a valid defense, as evidenced by the Authority's decision to order the builder to grant possession while also reimbursing the applicant.
The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around these two themes. Buyers contested what they saw as unfair withholding of possession, while also disputing any claims by the builder that they owed more money. The builder, on the other hand, tried to defend its actions by pointing to alleged payment shortfalls. A pattern emerges where the builder's litigation often stemmed from counterclaims to justify delays or possession withholding, rather than addressing the core issues raised by buyers.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their payment claims and non-compliance with the contractual obligation to deliver possession on time. The Authority's decision highlighted the need for builders to fulfill their commitments first, rather than making payment disputes a precondition for possession. Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for buyers about the importance of thorough due diligence and ensuring that builders adhere to clear contractual agreements.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-25747-11-0404 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Smt. Aruna Khare, filed a complain… | ["Possession of fla… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Smt. Aruna Khare | Vishwanath Construc… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/901111818118.pdf |