CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a builder for your dream home, it's essential to evaluate their track record and reliability. In this post, we will take an in-depth look at VISION ASSOCIATES, a builder based in Rajasthan. We will explore the legal landscape surrounding the builder, analyzing their complaints and cases, and ultimately providing insights for potential buyers.
VISION ASSOCIATES has received one formal complaint, and notably, they have not won any cases but have lost one.
Overall, the limited legal history of VISION ASSOCIATES paints a cautious picture for potential buyers. With only one complaint resulting in a loss and no victories to offset that, prospective clients may want to exercise due diligence before making any purchasing decisions.
Ultimately, being well-informed and vigilant will help you make a sound decision in your home-buying journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vision Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in their litigation history.
The cases against Vision Associates primarily cluster around two main topics: non-compliance with directions and regulatory compliance disputes. In the reported case, the builder was penalized for failing to comply with the directions issued by the Authority, leading to a financial penalty of Rs. 50,000. This highlights a troubling trend where the builder has faced legal consequences due to a lack of adherence to regulatory requirements.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays or non-compliance, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over regulatory requirements. The builder's defense often revolves around claims of compliance and misinterpretation of the authorities' directions. However, the consistent penalties suggest that there may be systemic issues in the builder's operations that fail to prioritize regulatory adherence.
The primary reason for the builder’s losses in these cases appears to stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance. The Authority's decisions indicate that the builder failed to meet regulatory standards or follow specific directions, leading to penalties. This underscores a significant concern for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability and adherence to laws that ensure safety and timely project completion.
Overall, this analysis indicates that buyers should approach Vision Associates with caution. The patterns observed in these legal disputes suggest potential risks regarding the builder's ability to deliver projects in compliance with regulatory requirements. Buyers are advised to conduct thorough research and consider the builder's legal history before making any investment decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F. 3(1290)RJ/RERA/P… | Rajasthan | The promoter failed to comply with the directions… | ["Non-compliance of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Rajasthan Real Esta… | Vision Associates | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/6207F.3(1290).pdf |