CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to investing in property, understanding the reputation of a builder is crucial. In this blog post, we will evaluate Viva Biotech Private Limited based on their complaint history and the details surrounding any legal cases. Our aim is to provide potential buyers with necessary insights and considerations before engaging with this builder.
Investing in real estate is significant and should be approached with caution and thorough research. We hope this assessment of Viva Biotech Private Limited helps guide your purchasing decision.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Viva Biotech Private Limited, which it ultimately lost, reveals several key insights into their litigation patterns and recurring themes.
The cases predominantly fall into a few common themes. First and foremost, 'Payment Disputes' emerge as a frequent topic, where the builder contests claims regarding amounts allegedly paid by customers. The second theme relates to 'Contractual Obligations', highlighting disputes over the fulfillment of booking formalities and finalization of allotments. 'Refund Issues' also surface, often connected to the builder's decisions to terminate agreements, prompting complaints from buyers. Lastly, 'Authorization and Representation Disputes' are evident, particularly in contexts where third parties are involved in transactions, leading to allegations of misrepresentation and a lack of clarity in contractual agreements.
The reasons behind the builder's decision to pursue legal action often revolve around contesting penalties linked to project delays, disputes regarding the legitimacy of received payments, and disagreements over the roles and responsibilities of associated entities involved in the sales process. In particular, the builder attempted to refute claims of financial irregularities, arguing that payments were either not made or were misrepresented by third parties acting on their behalf.
A review of the outcomes in these cases points to several common reasons for the builder's losses. These include an apparent lack of sufficient evidence to support their claims, gaps in adherence to legal or regulatory requirements, and their failure to comply with interim directions set forth by the court. Moreover, misunderstandings surrounding the roles of third-party representatives, like the association with IBIS Realty, added significant challenges to the builder's position in these disputes.
Overall, these cases illustrate the importance of clear communication, well-defined contractual terms, and meticulous compliance with legal standards in real estate transactions. For potential buyers, this serves as a reminder to ensure transparency and thorough verification of all dealings with builders to avoid similar pitfalls.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2207 of 2023 | Haryana | The complainant booked a commercial/residential u… | ["Refund", "Booking… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The complainant b… | Viva Biotech Privat… | M3M India Private L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTY2MTg2 |