Analysis of the cases filed against Viva Winner Venture Realtors LLP, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into three topics: Failure to Comply with Agreement Terms, Execution Stay Applications, and Interest Calculation Delays.

The majority of the cases centered around the Failure to Comply with Agreement Terms. In these instances, the appellants claimed that the builder had not adhered to the agreed-upon terms, which reflects a significant concern in the real estate sector where contractual obligations are paramount. The builder's defense consistently revolved around their assertion of compliance, yet the application was dismissed twice, indicating underlying issues that may warrant deeper investigation.

Execution Stay Applications were another recurring theme. The applicants in several cases sought to withdraw their applications for staying the execution, which suggests that there may have been attempts to halt actions taken by the builder, perhaps regarding project delays or other discrepancies. The builder’s response in these cases highlights a tactical choice to seek time for interest calculations, potentially indicating a defensive posture rather than addressing the root causes of the disputes.

The Interest Calculation Delays point to a broader issue of operational inefficiencies or inadequate legal representation by the builder, as evidenced by the repeated mention of an advocate's illness causing delays. This raises questions about the builder's reliability in fulfilling financial obligations tied to legal agreements.

Common triggers for litigation in these cases include:

• Contesting Compliance: Many disputes revolved around the builder’s alleged failure to meet the terms of the agreement.
• Delay Defense: The builder frequently sought to defend themselves by citing external factors, such as illnesses affecting their legal representation, rather than confronting the core issues raised.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to:

• Insufficient Evidence: The dismissal of the applications suggests that the builder may not have provided adequate proof of their compliance with the agreements.
• Tactical Delays: The repeated requests for time to calculate interest and the withdrawals of stay applications indicate a potential lack of clear strategy or adherence to timelines, which could undermine their position in legal battles.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Viva Winner Venture Realtors LLP, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily centered around issues related to interest rates on payments and procedural jurisdiction when seeking to rectify prior tribunal orders.

Specifically, appellants consistently sought adjustments to granted interest rates, requesting a higher rate of 20% instead of the 10.40% awarded. Simultaneously, there were recurring challenges to the tribunal's jurisdiction to address such applications, which fell under Section 39 of the RERA. The cases reflect a broader theme where buyers exhibited dissatisfaction with financial arrangements in their real estate transactions.

The reasons for these cases being brought to court often revolved around perceived fairness and expectations about payments that buyers believed were not met. In this case, the appellants contested the financial terms post-judgment, indicating a potential misunderstanding of legal processes as well as financial product structures tied to real estate transactions.

The builder emerged victorious in these disputes due to the opposing parties' failure to supply sufficient legal grounding for their claims, particularly regarding jurisdictional authority over the tribunal’s rulings and the applicability of interest rates being contested. This outcome demonstrates that the builder was not only aware of the regulatory environment but was adept at navigating legal frameworks effectively, indicating a robust understanding of compliance and legal requirements that support their operations.

This analysis also sheds light on the builder’s reputation in the market. It becomes clear that issues may stem from buyers making claims that could be misleading or exaggerated in their nature, resulting in futile legal battles. The strong track record of Viva Winner Venture Realtors LLP in successfully defending against such claims suggests that they maintain operational integrity and commitment to delivering on their promises.

For potential buyers, this serves as a critical reminder of the importance of conducting thorough research and making informed decisions before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. While disputes are natural in the real estate sector, it is vital to discern cases of legitimate grievances from those that may arise from misunderstandings or overly ambitious expectations. Buyers should approach claims judiciously and seek comprehensive information to avoid being swayed by potentially invalid accusations against builders.

This dictionary encapsulates the analysis of the specific case summaries and provides a structured, insightful overview for potential buyers looking to understand the dynamics at play in disputes involving builders like Viva Winner Venture Realtors LLP.