CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth property acquisition experience. This blog post delves into Vivaan Enterprise, a builder with a presence in Gujarat, examining its legal history and providing insights for potential buyers.
Vivaan Enterprise, operating exclusively in Gujarat, has registered a total of one complaint against them, culminating in one legal case that they lost. Their legal standing indicates a concerning precedent, particularly because they have not won any cases to date.
Vivaan Enterprise faced a case where the appellant claimed that the builder failed to submit a quarterly report on time as required by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder contended that a technical glitch hindered timely submission, but the authority rendered a verdict against them, resulting in penalties due to their default. This loss exemplifies the significance of adhering to regulatory frameworks in real estate.
The only case Vivaan Enterprise has lost includes a failure to comply with reporting regulations. This breach indicates potential administrative or operational shortcomings within the organization. Being found guilty of non-compliance can create critical ramifications for the builder’s reputation and operational viability, as clients expect adherence to legal and regulatory standards.
Interestingly, Vivaan Enterprise does not have any recorded cases won, suggesting that there have been no successful defenses against any claims made against them. This lack of victories indicates a need for improvement within their operational practices or legal strategy.
The legal record of Vivaan Enterprise raises red flags for potential buyers. With a single complaint resulting in a lost case, it highlights a possible inconsistency in meeting the regulatory expectations that govern real estate operations. Prospective buyers should approach Vivaan Enterprise with caution.
In essence, while Vivaan Enterprise presents a case for caution, informed decision-making can help potential buyers mitigate risks in real estate transactions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vivaan Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory compliance issues and delay/penalty disputes.
In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced legal action primarily for failing to adhere to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The most notable case involved the builder's failure to submit a quarterly report on time, which led to the authority imposing penalties for non-compliance. This instance underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards, highlighting the importance of timely reporting and transparency in real estate ventures.
Delay and penalty disputes represent another significant theme in the cases against Vivaan Enterprise. Although the specifics of additional delays or projects were not detailed in the summary, the case that was outlined indicates that the builder contested the imposition of penalties by claiming a technical glitch hindered their ability to file reports on time. This shows a common strategy employed by builders to dispute penalties by attributing delays to external factors beyond their control. However, the decision in this case suggests that such defenses may not always be sufficient to prevent a finding of default, indicating a degree of skepticism from the authorities regarding these types of justifications.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against Vivaan Enterprise seem to center around the builder's failure to meet regulatory requirements and fulfill their obligations in a timely manner. The imposition of penalties appears to be a trigger for legal action, as builders often seek to contest these fines and defend their operations. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that Vivaan Enterprise may have faced challenges related to maintaining compliance and managing deadlines, which could be a concern for potential clients evaluating their reliability.
The conclusion of these cases with a finding of guilt against the builder typically hinges on several factors, including insufficient evidence provided to defend their actions, a clear failure to comply with established regulations, or an inability to convincingly argue that delays were caused by unforeseen circumstances. This highlights the importance for builders to ensure they are well-versed in real estate regulations, maintain effective reporting systems, and are prepared to address any issues promptly to avoid legal disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GI/CMP/NCQR/Valsad/… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Vivaan Enterprise | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1SGQATlk_OmsZq9EEyEspv3bGoW9p_VOW |