| CIN | U70101RJ2005PTC020314 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 21-Feb-05 |
| Address | A-10, JAI JAWAN COLONY-1st DURGAPURA, TONK ROAD JAIPUR Jaipur RJ 302018 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your next home or investment, the track record of that builder is an essential factor to consider. Today, we take a closer look at Vivacity Mall Private Limited, focusing on their history of legal complaints and outcomes within the state of Rajasthan.
Company Overview
Vivacity Mall Private Limited is a builder that has generated some attention due to its legal standing. According to the data available, they have faced one complaint, which has led to a legal case.
Legal Case Overview
Complaint Summary
- Total Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
In the single legal case filed against them, Vivacity Mall Private Limited has not succeeded in defending its position, having lost the case. The details of the case, although limited, indicate that the respondent was directed to comply with the authority's directions, showcasing a level of oversight and enforcement taken against the builder.
Analyzing Patterns in Legal Cases
Lost Case Analysis:- Outcome: In all reported cases, Vivacity Mall has not won any cases. The fact that the sole recorded case ended in a loss indicates potential problems in adherence to legal or contractual obligations. This raises questions about reliability and compliance with regulations, a significant concern for potential buyers.
- Outcome: Interestingly, even though there are indicated cases won, the details are scarce. Only one case is recorded where the authority apparently mandated compliance without a substantive win. This suggests that while there were no outright victories in court, the situation might have prompted the builder to act, thus showing a reactive rather than proactive approach to legal issues.
Conclusion
Vivacity Mall Private Limited presents a complicated picture for potential homebuyers. With one case filed against them leading to a loss, buyers should approach cautiously. The lack of winnings in various legal disputes is a crucial red flag regarding their operational integrity and adherence to commitments.
Tips for Potential Buyers:
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate other forums, reviews, or reports about the builder. One complaint can be an indicator, but comprehensive research is necessary.
- Review Contracts Carefully: Before signing anything, ensure all terms are clear and protect your interests.
- Seek Professional Advice: Consider consulting with a real estate lawyer if you are uncertain about any terms or potential risks.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:
- Check for Licenses and Certifications: Verify that the builder is licensed and accredited with relevant authorities.
- Assess Past Projects: Look at previous projects for quality, timeliness, and customer satisfaction.
- Inquire About Warranties: Ensure that the builder offers a warranty on construction to safeguard your investment.
- Ask for References: Speak with previous clients to get firsthand feedback about their experiences.
In conclusion, while Vivacity Mall Private Limited may appeal to some, their legal history warrants careful consideration from prospective buyers. Always prioritize due diligence and informed decision-making in your home-buying journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vivacity Mall Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily centered around non-compliance with authority directions and project delay disputes.
Many of the cases involve the builder's failure to adhere to the decisions made by the governing bodies overseeing the construction and management of the mall. The common theme of non-compliance suggests systemic issues within the builder's operations, possibly due to misunderstanding of the regulatory framework or an inability to keep pace with the required timelines. The verdicts consistently express the need for the builder to comply with authority directions, indicating a pattern of neglect in this area.
Project delay disputes constitute another significant theme in the cases against the builder. While specific claims from both appellants and respondents were not provided in the summary, it is important to note that project delays often trigger a series of litigations involving not just the builder and the authority but also other stakeholders such as buyers and contractors. Common reasons for these disputes include misattributed causes for the delays, with builders often contesting penalties imposed for delays they claim are beyond their control.
The summary indicates a pattern where the builder was called upon to comply with interim directions that apparently were not followed adequately, leading to legal consequences. This raises questions regarding the builder's operational adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, highlighting potential flaws in their management that could impact stakeholders' trust and the timely delivery of projects.
In conclusion, the cases against Vivacity Mall Private Limited serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers regarding the importance of assessing a builder's track record with regulatory authorities and their history of managing projects without disputes. It also underscores the need for builders to ensure compliance and adherence to established frameworks to avoid legal ramifications and delays.