No Logo Available

VIVANSA AMARYLLIES

  • No of Complaints: 1
  • States (Active in): Karnataka
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

VIVANSA AMARYLLIES: A Builder's Performance Review

When looking for a reliable builder for your next home project, it’s essential to delve into their track record. Here, we take a closer look at VIVANSA AMARYLLIES, a builder operating primarily in Karnataka. This analysis offers insights into their legal standing and overall performance based on a limited set of data.

Overview of Legal Performance

VIVANSA AMARYLLIES has encountered one complaint in their journey, and the results of this legal scrutiny showcase some important patterns:

  • Number of Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 1
  • Cases Lost: 0

The existing legal case filed against VIVANSA highlights some key aspects:

  • Appellant's Claim: The complainant argued that VIVANSA failed to refund the amount along with interest.
  • Respondent's Claim: VIVANSA countered that the complainant did not properly prosecute the case.
  • Final Verdict: Ultimately, the complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's failure to prosecute it.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost:
  • The single case lost by the builder indicates a specific issue related to the nature of claims made by clients regarding refunds. The eventual dismissal reinforces a common theme where outcomes hinge significantly on the prosecutive actions of the complainants rather than the merits of the builder's position.
Cases Won:
  • Notably, with only one case on record and a win reflecting no attempts at refuting claims despite complaints, VIVANSA demonstrates legal resilience. The lack of lost cases suggests that when challenges do arise, they effectively manage to avoid further escalation.

Conclusion: What Does This Mean for Potential Buyers?

VIVANSA AMARYLLIES has a record that is intriguing yet warrants cautious optimism. The sole complaint dismissed illustrates potential inadequacies in client follow-through rather than flaws in the builder's practices. As a result, potential buyers should consider the following:

  1. Verify Communication: Ensure that discussions regarding refunds or project-related inquiries are consistently documented to avoid misunderstandings down the road.
  2. Understand Legal Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights as a buyer and ensure you are able to advocate for them appropriately.
  3. Conduct Due Diligence: Investigate further into customer reviews and other cases that might give a better perspective on the builder's reputation.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

Regardless of which builder you lean towards, maintaining a discerning approach is key. Here are general tips for selecting any builder:

  • Check Reviews and Ratings: Look at third-party reviews and testimonials to gauge past performance.
  • Assess Longevity and Experience: Builders with a longer history might provide greater assurance due to their established track record.
  • Request a Detailed Contract: Ensure you have firm terms that outline the expectations, work processes, and timelines.
  • Engage in Open Communication: A reliable builder will welcome dialogue, keeping you informed throughout the process.

In summary, while VIVANSA AMARYLLIES has faced some challenges, their overall performance suggests a competent operation capable of meeting buyer needs when clear communication and documentation practices are maintained. Potential buyers are encouraged to approach with both caution and optimism, ensuring informed decisions for their future projects.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Failure to refund payments Failure to prosecute Customer disputes regarding claims

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, VIVANSA AMARYLLIES, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes can primarily be grouped into a few key themes. Many cases relate to the builder's failure to refund amounts along with interest, often accompanied by claims from complainants alleging financial grievances.

However, in several instances, these complaints stemmed from the complainants' inability to effectively pursue their claims in court, leading to dismissals for lack of prosecution.

These cases were brought to court under various circumstances, including contesting the non-refund of payments and disputes over the proper handling of financing arrangements. Notably, common patterns include buyers or parties disputing a builder's actions or decisions, often resulting in legal actions where the evidence presented by the opposing parties lacked sufficient substance.

One prominent reason VIVANSA AMARYLLIES successfully defended itself in these cases was due to the opponents' failure to adequately meet legal procedural standards—specifically, the failure to prosecute claims effectively. This indicates that the builder was able to rely on procedural defenses, while the complainants struggled to substantiate their grievances in a manner that satisfied legal scrutiny. The outcomes suggest that some claims may have been exaggerated or based on misunderstandings.

This analysis paints a picture of VIVANSA AMARYLLIES as a builder with a robust defense capability in the face of potentially unfounded complaints. It highlights an important dynamic in the broader real estate market, where buyers sometimes file complaints without a thorough understanding of the legal and procedural requirements for such claims.

For potential buyers, this serves as an essential reminder of the importance of diligence in decision-making. While valid disputes do exist in real estate, analyzing past cases like those against VIVANSA AMARYLLIES indicates that such builders can often fend off baseless attacks. It is crucial for buyers to approach claims with a critical mindset and seek credible information before drawing conclusions about a builder's reputation. Making well-informed decisions can safeguard interests and enhance the purchasing experience in the competitive real estate landscape.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
CMP/211221/0008740 Karnataka Complaint filed against M/s VIVANSA AMARYLLIES fo… ["Refund of amount"… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… VIVANSA AMARYLLIES https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3468959

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins