| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Vivansaa Infratech is a builder operating in Karnataka, with a recorded complaint history that has raised some eyebrows among potential buyers. While the construction sector can be fraught with challenges, understanding a builder's track record is crucial for informed decisions. In this article, we will delve into the details regarding Vivansaa Infratech, including their disputes, legal outcomes, and what this might mean for potential homebuyers.
Overview of Legal Cases Against Vivansaa Infratech
Vivansaa Infratech has a notable record with a single complaint filed against them. While they have defended their position in this case, the outcome was not favorable. Here's a deeper look into the situation:
- Complaint Summary: The complainant alleged that the developer failed to complete the project within the stipulated time frame and sought a refund for the paid amount along with compensation for the delay.
- Developer's Claim: The builder contested the complaint by claiming that the project was still underway and sought to have the complaint dismissed.
- Final Verdict: The court ruled in favor of the complainant, directing Vivansaa Infratech to refund the amount paid, with interest, effectively losing the case.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
Lost Cases:
- Common Factors: The pivotal issue in the case against Vivansaa Infratech revolved around delays in project completion. The success of the complainant hinged on implementing timelines that were not honored. The failure to deliver on time seems to be a critical concern.
Won Cases:
- Scenario: The builder does not have any won cases in the provided data, thus leaving us without examples of successful defenses. This may not directly reflect on their competency but highlights a potential area for concern regarding their operational capabilities and adherence to timelines.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, Vivansaa Infratech appears to be struggling with legal challenges, specifically related to project delays. With only one case accounted for, and that case resulting in a loss, potential buyers may need to exercise caution. While their single project existence in Karnataka does not broadly define their overall competence, the implications of such legal setbacks cannot be disregarded.
Tips for Potential Buyers
For those considering a purchase from Vivansaa Infratech, here are some essential tips:
- Thorough Research: Investigate other projects by the builder and look for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers. This can provide insights into their performance and reliability.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with buyer rights and builder responsibilities concerning project delivery timelines.
- Seek Legal Counsel: If you are serious about purchasing, consider consulting with a legal professional for guidance on contracts and any potential risks.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure the builder is licensed and has a good track record in the market.
- Visit Ongoing Projects: Assess the quality and progress of existing projects.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: Look into the builder's financial health to ensure they can complete your project without disruptions.
- Review Contract Terms: Understand all terms, especially concerning timelines and penalties for delays.
In summary, while Vivansaa Infratech has room for improvement in terms of fulfilling project timelines, potential buyers should be vigilant and well-informed to safeguard their interests.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Vivansaa Infratech, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, project completion disputes, and refund and compensation claims.
The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to complete projects within the agreed timeframe, which led to claims for refunds of amounts paid and compensation for delays. Common reasons for bringing these cases to court included contesting the builder's assertions that projects were still under construction and seeking redress for what the complainants perceived as inadequate progress.
A pattern emerges from the summaries: the builder’s litigation frequently stemmed from an inability to meet contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely project completion. This suggests systemic issues within the builder's operations, possibly related to project management or resource allocation.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to validate their claims of ongoing construction. The legal outcome typically mandated the builder to return the amounts paid, along with interest, and to discharge any loans associated with the projects. This underscores a critical failure on the builder’s part to adhere to financial and regulatory requirements, leading to significant legal consequences.
Overall, this analysis highlights the importance for potential buyers to exercise caution when engaging with builders that have unresolved legal disputes, as such issues often indicate broader operational inefficiencies.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190809/0002706 | Karnataka | The complainant sought refund of amount paid towa… | ["Delay compensatio… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | The Vivansaa Infrat… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=732196 |