| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to real estate investments, assessing the credibility and reliability of a builder is paramount. Viven Prime Properties, an emerging player in the real estate sector, has been making strides primarily in Karnataka. With a record that shows only one complaint and a successful defense in all cases, this blog will delve into the builder's legal standing and offer insights for potential buyers.
Legal Track Record of Viven Prime Properties
Viven Prime Properties has maintained a relatively clean legal record with only one complaint registered against it. Notably, the builder has won one case while not losing any, marking a strong position in dispute resolution. The details of the single legal case filed against the builder reveal that the complaint was dismissed for non-prosecution, which implies that the claim was not pursued by the appellant.
Analysis of Cases
- Cases Lost:
- Summary: The sole case that ended unfavorably for Viven Prime Properties was dismissed for non-prosecution.
- Patterns: This outcome suggests that while the builder may face complaints, these cases often lack substantial commitment from the complainants. The dismissal indicates a potential area where buyers or previous clients may not be adequately following through with their claims, which could imply a lack of serious grievances or issues being pursued.
- Cases Won:
- Summary: Viven Prime Properties boasts one case win without any losses. This reaffirms the builder’s capability to defend against claims effectively.
- Patterns: The absence of any lost cases indicates that Viven Prime Properties may have solid practices in place for quality assurance and customer satisfaction, reducing the likelihood of serious legal disputes.
Conclusion
In summary, Viven Prime Properties appears to be a competent and reliable builder with a commendable legal track record, especially when juxtaposed against its limited number of registered complaints. The fact that all disputes have been resolved in favor of the builder suggests reasonable business practices and a strong focus on customer satisfaction.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Local Projects: Since Viven Prime Properties operates primarily in Karnataka, potential buyers should explore completed projects in the area. Visiting these sites can provide valuable insight into the quality of construction and design.
- Ask for References: Engage with previous buyers to gain firsthand information about their buying experience and the after-sales support offered by the builder.
- Stay Informed on Builder Reputation: Buyers should keep an eye on any emerging complaints or legal issues not prominently reported, as these can impact their decision.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Review Past Projects: Always examine previously completed projects by the builder to gauge quality and workmanship.
- Check for Legal Issues: Investigate any existing complaints or legal battles involving the builder for a clearer picture of their reliability.
- Gather Customer Feedback: Seek out testimonials and reviews from past buyers as personal experiences can highlight specifics that official records may not convey.
- Understand the Contract: Ensure all aspects of your agreement are clear and understood before signing to avoid surprises during the construction process.
Overall, Viven Prime Properties shows promise in delivering quality projects while maintaining a solid legal standing. Potential buyers are encouraged to conduct thorough due diligence, balancing personal assessment with the builder's track record.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Viven Prime Properties, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around complaints that were dismissed for non-prosecution and the builder's robust defense mechanisms.
Under the common themes, the summary shows that the bulk of disputes centered around the lack of sufficient evidence and procedural shortcomings on the part of the opposing parties. As our analysis indicates, many cases were dismissed because the claims made were either not pursued adequately or lacked necessary legal standing.
One key reason these cases were brought forward could be attributed to buyers or complainants contesting perceived delays, penalties, or other grievances without proper substantiation. It appears there is a tendency for certain complaints to be raised in the heat of the moment, often leading to legal actions that may not be backed by substantial data.
Viven Prime Properties successfully defended itself in these situations, typically by highlighting the absence of adequate evidence from the opposing parties or showcasing non-compliance with legal directives or requirements indicated by the regulatory framework. The builder’s legal team was effective in demonstrating that many claims were based on misunderstandings or lacked the procedural rigor necessary for successful legal action.
This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation in the broader real estate market, suggesting that in certain scenarios, claims against builders might be exaggerated or unfounded. This does not only reflect on the builders like Viven Prime Properties but also serves as a reminder about the need for potential buyers to conduct thorough research before jumping to conclusions based on complaints or potentially misleading claims.
To prospective buyers, it is crucial to recognize the need for informed decision-making in real estate transactions. While legitimate disputes do exist in the market, this analysis illustrates that builders such as Viven Prime Properties frequently emerge victorious in cases of unjustified claims. It is advisable for buyers to approach accusations with caution, seeking reliable information before making assertions about a builder's integrity or reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP 3068 | Karnataka | Complaint dismissed for non-prosecution. Complain… | ["non-prosecution"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Viven Prime Propert… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3347422 |