VRIKSHAA VASSEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION

Analyzing Vrikshaa Vassees Welfare Association: A Builder's Performance Review

When considering a real estate investment, the reputation and track record of a builder is paramount. Vrikshaa Vassees Welfare Association, operating in Tamil Nadu, has recently attracted attention with a mixed performance in legal matters. Here, we analyze the outcomes of the builder's legal cases to offer potential buyers a clearer understanding of what to expect.

Overview of Legal Performance

• Number of Complaints: 5
• Cases Won: 4
• Cases Lost: 1

Vrikshaa Vassees Welfare Association has won a notable majority of its legal cases, boasting a winning percentage of 80%. However, they have faced one significant loss, which raises questions about their compliance with previous commitments.

Breakdown of Cases Lost

The sole case that the builder lost involved allegations that they had illegally sold plots without approved plans or proper compliance to previous orders. Here’s a closer look at this case:

• Appellant …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the Vrikshaa Vassees Welfare Association, which were ultimately lost by the builder, reveals significant insights into their operational practices and recurring disputes.

Firstly, two common themes emerge from these cases: 'Non-compliance with Municipal Orders' and 'Disputes over Land Ownership and Sale'.

Under the theme of Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, the builder was frequently involved in litigation regarding their failure to adhere to regulations and earlier orders from municipal authorities. This suggests a pattern of regulatory neglect, where the builder may have proceeded with selling plots and developing property without securing necessary approvals.

The second theme concerning 'Disputes over Land Ownership and Sale' highlights the builder’s involvement in conflicts related to the sale of plots, particularly regarding the legality of these transactions. The disputes arose primarily from the builder's actions of selling plots purportedly without the relevant permissions or in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.

The disputes predominantly revolve around the provision of promised amenities, compliance with final orders, and leadership claims within the homeowner association.

1. Amenities Provision Claims: The builder faced multiple claims regarding the failure to provide common amenities such as a jogging track, gym, swimming pool, and multipurpose hall as advertised. In these cases, the builders successfully argued that they were in the process of developing the project in phases and that some allegations were made by individuals not officially representing the homeowner association.

2. Non-compliance with Final Orders: There were instances where the Execution Petitioner claimed the builder had not adhered to previous final orders regarding amenity construction. The builder countered, stating that they had completed most amenities but had not moved forward with certain features like the swimming …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis