CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the construction and real estate industry, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment and overall satisfaction. Wakatund Township Private Limited operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh, but they have been met with several challenges when it comes to customer complaints and legal disputes. This post explores the performance of Wakatund Township based on the available data regarding their complaints and legal cases.
Wakatund Township Private Limited has faced a total of 4 complaints, all of which have culminated in legal cases. Unfortunately for the builder, they have not won any of these cases, resulting in an unfavorable legal history. Below is an overview of the circumstances surrounding the cases they have faced:
Upon analyzing the builder's legal battles, we can identify some patterns:
Interestingly, there seems to be a mix-up in the data provided; the summary mistakenly states King Wakatund Township has won cases when in fact, they have lost all their legal battles based on the initial complaint count. The key outcomes reflect a pattern where the authority consistently ruled in favor of the applicants due to the builder's deficiencies.
Wakatund Township Private Limited's track record raises significant concerns for potential buyers. With 4 lost cases and no victories, it seems this builder has a pattern of issues regarding execution and customer satisfaction. For those considering investment in properties under this banner, it is advisable to proceed with caution.
In conclusion, while Wakatund Township Private Limited may present opportunities in the Madhya Pradesh real estate market, the clear red flags raise questions about reliability and customer service. Armed with this knowledge, potential buyers can make informed decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Wakatund Township Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Failure to Execute Sale Deed, and Refund Disputes.
The majority of the cases fell under the theme of Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, the applicants primarily claimed that despite paying the full consideration amount, the builder had failed to provide them with possession of their plots or execute the necessary sale deeds. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of unforeseen circumstances and allegations that buyers had not paid the complete amount owed. However, the legal authorities did not accept these defenses and consistently ruled in favor of the applicants, indicating a pattern of negligence on the part of the builder.
The Failure to Execute Sale Deed theme overlaps significantly with the delayed possession claims, as the execution of sale deeds was often a key part of the buyers’ grievances. The builder's inability to fulfill this contractual obligation further aggravated the disputes and led to legal consequences.
Refund Disputes emerged as another theme, where the applicant sought a refund due to a cancelled booking and interest on the amount deposited. The builder's claim that the applicant was not eligible for interest was rejected, and the authority ruled in favor of the applicant, highlighting the builder's unfulfilled obligations regarding refunds and interest payments.
Common triggers for litigation in these cases included the builder’s failure to deliver possession on time, the non-execution of sale deeds, and issues related to refunds. The builder's repeated losses can be attributed to several factors, primarily insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with contractual obligations, and a lack of understanding of their legal requirements. The outcomes serve as a strong warning to potential buyers, indicating a high risk associated with investing in properties developed by Wakatund Township Private Limited.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-5772-17-0254 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Refund of cancell… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Badrilal Parmar | Wakatund Township P… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/883350101083.pdf |
97-18--4274 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Non-performance o… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Sundallal Pal | Wakatund Township P… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/153554333359.pdf |
4-2 400-48-4302 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Non-execution of … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Himanshu Naik | Wakatund Township P… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/148225344648.pdf |