| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to property investment, understanding the builder's credibility is crucial for making an informed decision. In this blog post, we delve into the details surrounding Walkway the Mall, a builder operating in Gujarat. With a minimal complaint history but a record of losing their only legal case, potential buyers should examine the circumstances closely before proceeding.
Builder Overview
Name: Walkway the Mall
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat
Legal Case Analysis
During the legal proceedings involving Walkway the Mall, one prominent case was brought under the purview of RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority). The promoter claimed that they had fulfilled all necessary requirements stipulated by the RERA regulations. However, RERA claimed that the promoter had failed to provide adequate details regarding their projects. There was a persistent lack of communication and action on the part of the promoter despite multiple attempts from RERA to reach out through emails. The final verdict saw the builder fined Rs. 10,000 for non-compliance with the regulatory body's instructions.
Patterns in Cases Lost
One notable pattern in the case that Walkway the Mall lost is the failure to maintain adequate communication and provide the necessary details as requested by RERA. This indicates potential issues in the builder's transparency and responsiveness, essential traits for any credible builder. The fact that they lost their only legal case also points toward a lack of sufficient documentation and adherence to regulatory demands, which can be crucial in the construction sector.
Patterns in Cases Won
Interestingly, Walkway the Mall has not yet won any cases to date. Therefore, we cannot identify any patterns or factors related to winning cases. This absence of winning cases should raise additional questions about the builder's operational practices and overall reliability.
Conclusion
In light of the provided data, Walkway the Mall presents a mixed picture for potential buyers. With only one complaint and a lost case, it would be prudent for buyers to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before making a purchase.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Walkway the Mall
- Seek Transparency: Request detailed documentation about the builder's previous projects and any ongoing developments.
- Request References: Talk to previous customers of Walkway the Mall and inquire about their experiences with the builder.
- Check Regulatory Compliance: Investigate if the builder has had any prior issues or penalties from regulatory bodies like RERA.
- Evaluate Communication: Observe how prompt and transparent the builder is in communications when you ask questions, as this reflects their commitment to client service.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Research Their Track Record: Look into past projects for quality and completion times.
- Read Reviews and Testimonials: Gain insights from existing customers regarding their building experiences.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit projects completed by the builder to assess quality firsthand.
- Understand Terms and Conditions: Ensure you are clear about all terms relating to payment, timelines, and warranties.
By keeping these insights and tips in mind, potential buyers can navigate the property market more effectively and make informed decisions when selecting a builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Walkway the Mall, in which they lost, reveals significant insights about their ongoing disputes primarily concerning regulatory compliance and documentation.
In these cases, the theme of Regulatory Non-compliance was prevalent, as seen when RERA imposed fines for the builder's failure to meet specific regulatory requirements. The cases suggest that the builder frequently encountered challenges in demonstrating adherence to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) mandates.
Another recurring issue was the Failure to Provide Adequate Documentation. The builder contended that they had fulfilled all RERA's requirements. However, the evidence pointed to a lack of necessary details and an overall inactivity from the builder, which RERA highlighted through multiple communications. This inadequate documentation ultimately led to unfavorable outcomes for the builder, indicating that the burden of proof in regulatory disputes lies heavily on the promoter.
The core reasons the builder filed these cases revolved around contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and disputing claims attributed to their inaction. This indicates a pattern where the builder likely sought to challenge decisions made by regulatory bodies that unfavorably impacted their reputation and operational capabilities.
However, the reasons for the builder's loss in these cases were strikingly consistent. Common factors included insufficient evidence to support their claims, as seen in RERA's findings of inadequate details, and failure to comply with legal directives issued by regulatory authorities. Moreover, the lack of proactive engagement from the builder, coupled with their misunderstanding of regulatory requirements, contributed to the unsuccessful outcomes in these disputes. This pattern of litigation not only reflects poorly on the builder’s practices but also raises concerns for potential buyers regarding the builder's ability to meet compliance standards moving forward.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gujrera/4*9/2018 T.… | Gujarat | The promoter, Walkway the Mall, was fined Rs. 10,… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "The promoter claimed that th… | Walkway the Mall | Gujarat Real Estate… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1fKlh19VevqhnI43oxnzLr2wekOdFJVUx |