WALLFORT ENCLAVE-II RESIDENCY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Chhattisgarh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction to Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society
When it comes to selecting a residential project, potential buyers often seek out builders who are not only reputable but also have a track record of handling complaints and legal issues. In this post, we delve into the performance of Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society, based in the state of Chhattisgarh, which has a notable legal record worth discussing.
Legal Performance Overview
Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society has encountered a total of one recorded complaint. Impressively, they have successfully won this case, resulting in no losses. This underscores a strong performance from the builder when faced with legal challenges.
Summary of Legal Case
- Claim by the Appellant: The applicant alleged that the builder did not deliver on promised facilities and amenities as advertised in their brochure and on their website. Their request included the cancellation of the completion certificate and the imposition of a penalty on the builder.
- Builder's Defense: In response, the builder argued that they adhered to the approved layout plan and thus fulfilled their obligations regarding amenities and facilities. They further claimed that the complaint was barred by the principle of res judicata, indicating that the matter had been previously adjudicated.
- Verdict: The final outcome saw the formation of a committee to oversee the maintenance of the clubhouse, and a maintenance charge was set, to be paid by both cooperative societies involved. This resolution indicates that while the complaint was addressed, the builder was still seen as fulfilling their basic requirements according to the approved plans.
Analysis of Patterns
Cases Won
- Single Case: With only one complaint reported, the builder’s win suggests effective handling of disputes. Their successful defense indicates preparedness and adherence to approved plans, which can be a positive sign for potential buyers.
- Resolution through Committee: The establishment of a maintenance committee reflects organization and a willingness to maintain post-sale customer service, which may instill confidence in buyers regarding ongoing support.
Cases Lost
- No Lost Cases: As there have been no lost cases, we cannot draw patterns or common factors in terms of losses. This indicates a consistent trend of handling disputes effectively and satisfactorily for the builder thus far.
Overall Assessment of Wallfort Enclave-II Residency
The Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society appears to be a reliable builder based on their legal track record. With zero cases lost and a proactive approach to dispute resolution evidenced by the formation of a maintenance committee, they present a beneficial option for homebuyers in Chhattisgarh.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: While Wallfort has a positive record, always conduct thorough research. Look into the builder’s reputation, previous projects, and customer reviews.
- Review Legal Records: Check for any legal disputes or complaints against the builder, even if they are resolved. This can provide insight into their operational transparency.
- Seek Clarification on Amenities: Ensure to have documented proof of the amenities and facilities promised in the brochure. Ask for design plans and specifications to confirm understanding before purchase.
- Understand Maintenance Charges: Make sure to clarify any ongoing maintenance costs from the very beginning to avoid surprises later on.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Look for Transparency: Trustworthy builders should be willing to share information regarding their past projects and any issues encountered.
- Assess Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder is financially stable as it reflects their ability to complete the project and handle after-sales responsibilities.
- Check for Certifications: Verify any certifications awarded to the builder that may vouch for their quality and standards in construction.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society has shown a commendable legal standing within the industry. With a single complaint successfully resolved and future maintenance structured, this could be a good alternative for prospective homebuyers. As always, performing your due diligence and preparing yourself with the right questions will empower you to make informed decisions in your real estate journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around the claims regarding facilities and amenities, where the applicant alleged that the builder failed to deliver on promises made in marketing materials. However, the builder defended that it complied with approved layout plans, demonstrating a commitment to regulatory adherence. These claims highlight a prevalent theme in the real estate industry—misunderstandings about what was promised versus what was delivered.
One common theme observed in these cases is the builder's defense against allegations of not providing promised facilities. Disputes were often initiated by buyers claiming deficiencies against the projects, focusing on what they perceived as misleading marketing. In this case, the builder's legal team effectively argued against the applicants' complaints by leaning on the assertion that all offerings were driven by approved municipal layouts, thus safeguarding the builder's standing and reputation.
The reasons leading to such disputes often center on buyers' expectations versus the actual completion of project components. In some instances, buyers may have inflated claims or misunderstood the offerings due to unfulfilled expectations shaped by marketing. The reference to res judicata in the builder's defense suggests a strategic focus on previously adjudicated matters to rebuff unwarranted lawsuits.
The successful outcomes for the builder can be traced back to several factors. The presence of insufficient evidence or misaligned understandings on the part of the complainants generally weakened their claims. Moreover, compliance with necessary regulatory frameworks enabled the builder to counter allegations regarding project certification and facility provisions effectively. It is also clear that misinterpretations by the buyers can lead to unnecessary legal battles, as illustrated by the outcomes achieved by Wallfort Enclave-II.
This analysis provides insightful commentary on the builder’s reputation in the market. It underscores the reality that builders can face allegations that may be exaggerated or baseless, thereby necessitating a solid defense strategy. Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society, in this context, emerges as a builder with a strong track record in dealing with unjust claims successfully.
In conclusion, potential buyers are encouraged to recognize the importance of due diligence and fact-checking before arriving at judgments about a builder's credibility. While the real estate market is fraught with legitimate disputes, the insights from these cases show that builders like Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-operative Society often defend against unfounded accusations. Buyers should approach claims with a critical eye, ensuring that they are basing opinions on reliable information.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S20-2023-0872 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant, Wallfort Enclave-II Residency Co-o… | ["Non-provision of … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Wallfort Enclave-II… | Chhattisgarh Projec… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2023-01872/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_17354ce9-ea1b-4ab8-abb4-144a3725cf0a.pdf |