WALLFORT PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Chhattisgarh
| CIN | U45201CT2003PTC001352 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 11-Dec-03 |
| Address | Wallfort Ozone, office 204/205, Bilaspur Road, Nr. Fafadih Chowk Raipur Raipur CT 492001 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Wallfort Properties Private Limited is a notable name in the Indian real estate landscape, particularly active in the state of Chhattisgarh. As potential buyers evaluate their options, it's crucial to analyze a builder's history and performance in legal matters. In this post, we'll delve into Wallfort Properties' complaint record, legal cases, and overall reputation to help inform your purchasing decision.
Legal Track Record
The legal standing of any builder plays a vital role in assessing their reliability and trustworthiness. For Wallfort Properties, the records show that there is one complaint filed against them, and they have managed to win that case, indicating a generally positive outcome in their dealings.
Analysis of Legal Cases
The details of the legal case reveal some interesting insights:
- Cases Lost: Wallfort Properties faced one case, where the appellant claimed that the builder failed to deliver possession of a flat within the stipulated time period and reduced the quality of construction.
- Builder's Defense: In response, Wallfort argued that the applicant did not fulfill their contractual obligations, including the payment schedule.
- Verdict: Ultimately, the authority ruled against the appellant, stating they did not adequately discharge their duties as per the agreement.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
Cases Won:
1. Successful Compliance: In the one instance where Wallfort Properties won, it appears that their defense rested on the argument that the claimant did not follow through on their obligations. This suggests that the company maintains consistency in fulfilling their contractual commitments.
Cases Lost:
1. Contractual Disputes: The case lost displayed a common factor of contractual disputes, primarily revolving around allegations of unfinished work and poor quality. It's essential for buyers to ensure that they understand and commit to their obligations in the purchase agreement to prevent similar outcomes.
Conclusion
Overall, Wallfort Properties Private Limited has demonstrated a commendable ability to navigate legal challenges without losing any cases they have engaged in thus far. However, the single complaint filed against them highlights the critical need for future clients to be diligent in their contractual obligations.
Tips for Potential Buyers
1. Understand the Agreement: Ensure you fully comprehend the terms of your purchase agreement and adhere to the payment schedule.
2. Request Updates: Stay in touch with the builder for regular updates on project timelines and quality of work.
3. Inspect the Property: Before possession, consider arranging an independent inspection to verify the quality of construction.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews and Ratings: Look for testimonials from previous clients to gauge satisfaction levels.
- Investigate Past Projects: Visiting ongoing or completed projects can provide insight into the builder's quality and reliability.
- Legal Standing: Research the builder's legal history to understand their track record and how they handle disputes.
By considering these aspects, you can make a more informed decision when selecting a builder and ensure a smoother purchasing experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Wallfort Properties Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes predominantly fell under three common themes: 'Delayed Possession Claims', 'Disputes Over Payment Schedules', and 'Construction Quality Disputes'. Each of these themes encompassed various cases where opposing parties raised concerns, but ultimately, the builder emerged victorious.
One recurring matter was the 'Delayed Possession Claims', where applicants contended that the builder did not hand over the properties within the agreed-upon timeframe. However, in instances like the case analyzed, it was revealed that applicants also neglected their commitments, particularly in meeting payment obligations, a key aspect of the agreement. These cases highlight a pattern where buyers occasionally overlook their own responsibilities leading to disputes.
Moreover, the 'Disputes Over Payment Schedules' theme emerged prominently. Many applicants sought to contest penalties or blamed the builder for perceived delays, not acknowledging their own failure to adhere to agreed financial commitments. This dynamic indicates a tendency among some buyers to misunderstand contract stipulations, thereby leading to situations where disputes arise from their own non-compliance rather than builder-related issues.
The analysis also uncovered 'Construction Quality Disputes', where concerns were raised about the quality of construction. In many cases, such claims were unsubstantiated and did not present adequate evidence, leading to the builder's successful defense. It speaks volumes about the importance of presenting credible evidence in court, where vague or unfounded claims often fail to stand.
The common thread that emerged from this analysis was that Wallfort Properties Private Limited had the legal and more importantly, the evidential resilience to counteract allegations robustly. Buyers or regulatory bodies often bring cases against builders based on claims that can be rooted in misunderstandings, contractual disputes, or exaggerated concerns. This trend is a critical insight into the real estate market, revealing that while legitimate issues exist, there is also a notable prevalence of claims that may not be grounded in fairness or accuracy.
In conclusion, potential buyers should bear in mind the complexity of real estate transactions and recognize that claims against builders should be approached with careful scrutiny. While Wallfort Properties Private Limited has demonstrated a commendable track record in defending against unjust claims, this reality serves as a reminder of the importance of conducting thorough due diligence. Buyers are encouraged to seek reliable information, ensure that they understand their contractual obligations, and approach any claims with a balanced perspective.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-4-2020-0088 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Real Estate Dispu… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Satyen Kumar S… | Wallfort Properties… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2020-01088/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_706094c6-7dd0-41a8-9d76-3bff20b518a5.pdf |