| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your next construction project, due diligence is crucial. Among the various builders, Wallman Group has made its mark with projects primarily in Gujarat. In this blog post, we will explore the legal standing of Wallman Group, analyze any patterns in their legal cases, and offer practical tips for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases Against Wallman Group
Wallman Group has faced a total of two legal complaints, both of which they did not win. Importantly, both cases resulted in a withdrawal by the complainant, leading to their disposal as withdrawn. This data brings us to two key observations about Wallman Group's legal circumstances:
- Legal Challenges: The builder has not succeeded in defending any cases as they were ultimately withdrawn without a decision in their favor.
- Withdrawal Trends: The cases were disposed of due to the complainants withdrawing their claims. This suggests that the issues may have been resolved outside of court or that the complainants may have reconsidered pursuing their complaints.
Analysis of Legal Outcomes
Cases Lost:
- Total Cases Lost: 2
- Common Factors: Both cases had appellants who ultimately withdrew their complaints. Unfortunately, specific details regarding the claims made by the complainants are not provided, making it challenging to identify distinct patterns or underlying issues that led to the withdrawals. This lack of information could indicate that the disputes might not have risen to the level of litigation, or there were other resolution avenues explored before a formal process was pursued.
Cases Won:
- Total Cases Won: 0
- Common Factors: In the context of the provided data, there are no actual wins for Wallman Group in terms of judgment or favorable outcomes from any complaints filed against them. The legal history indicates that all cases were resolved without the merits being adjudicated.
Conclusion
Based on the limited legal data presented, Wallman Group has faced challenges pertaining to client complaints but has not received judgments against them. While the withdrawal of the complaints could signify that resolutions were reached amicably, it does highlight a potential level of discontent that may warrant further investigation.
For potential buyers considering Wallman Group for their projects, here are some tips:
- Conduct Thorough Research: Assess not just the legal history but also client reviews and project outcomes to gain a comprehensive understanding of the builder's reputation.
- Visit Previous Projects: If possible, visiting past projects can provide insight into the quality and craftsmanship of Wallman Group's work.
- Request References: Ask for references from previous clients to better understand their experiences and satisfaction levels.
General Tips for Buyers when Selecting Any Builder:
- Check Credentials: Ensure the builder has the necessary licenses and credentials to operate in your state.
- Look at Their Portfolio: A strong portfolio demonstrates the builder's capabilities and style, helping you gauge if they can meet your specific needs.
- Compare Quotes: Don’t settle for the first quote. Obtaining multiple estimates can help you understand fair pricing for the work required.
- Understand the Contract: Before signing, carefully review the contract details, including timelines, payment structures, and warranty information.
- Stay Involved: Maintain communication throughout the process to ensure the project stays aligned with your expectations.
Choosing the right builder can significantly impact your construction project. By being informed and proactive, potential buyers can make well-rounded decisions when considering Wallman Group or any other builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the Wallman Group builder, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.
The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification, Project Delay Penalties, and Regulatory Non-compliance. Each of these themes highlights common grievances that property buyers and regulators may have against builders, and the Wallman Group is no exception.
Delayed Possession Claims typically revolve around the builder's inability to complete projects on time, which is a repeated concern in the construction sector. Buyers expect timely possession of their properties, and when developers fail to meet deadlines, it often leads to dissatisfaction and legal disputes.
Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification usually stem from disagreements regarding the intended use of land or the builder's adherence to zoning regulations. This could involve allegations of improper conversion of agricultural land to residential use or failure to obtain necessary approvals, leading to legal challenges.
Project Delay Penalties are imposed when builders do not adhere to established timelines, causing delays that can result in increased costs and loss of value for buyers. Litigations in this area often focus on the builder's accountability for these delays and the penalties that buyers believe they should incur.
Regulatory Non-compliance encompasses a range of issues, including violations of municipal orders, failure to secure necessary permits, and non-adherence to environmental regulations. This theme highlights the importance of builders operating within the legal framework and the challenges they face when they do not.
The common triggers for the Wallman Group's litigation include contesting these penalties, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. Buyers may feel aggrieved when their expectations are not met, especially in terms of timely delivery and regulatory compliance.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to follow interim directions provided by courts or regulatory bodies. Additionally, misunderstandings of land or project classification rules may have contributed to their legal defeats, highlighting the need for builders to ensure thorough legal and regulatory due diligence in their operations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/Vadodara/220509… | Gujarat | The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, a… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Aashutoshkumar J. B… | Wallman Group Partn… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1nsDqGNK-1Bqgc3Np0lcFBEVFnwWJqhF5 |
| CMP/Vadodara/220505… | Gujarat | The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, a… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Hitesh Prajapati | Wallman Group Partn… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1gLTHEg3lAgoDeePBfdH-JBTfgvkjsued |