No Logo Available

WATERLINE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINU55101KA2008PTC045815
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressMiraya Rose by UKN, 66/1 Siddapura Village, HAL – Varthur Main Road, Whitefield, Bangalore Bangalore KA 560066 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Waterline Hotels Private Limited operates within the hospitality sector and is primarily involved in real estate development in Karnataka. Like many builders in the industry, they face the rigors of legal scrutiny, illuminating their dealings with customers and regulatory bodies. This blog aims to provide a detailed understanding of the builder's legal standing, especially in light of a recent complaint, and offers insights for potential buyers.

Legal Overview and Case Summary

Waterline Hotels has experienced a single complaint against them, which has resulted in a loss. The case revolved around the appellant’s claims regarding the builder's failure to register their project under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and to complete essential development works. Here’s a brief breakdown of the critical elements of the case:

Summary of Legal Case:

  • Appellant's Claim: The appellant alleged that Waterline Hotels did not register their project under RERA and failed to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
RERA Compliance Issues Delayed Development Works Occupancy Certificate Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Waterline Hotels Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around issues of compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), delayed development works, and disputes over occupancy certificates.

The RERA compliance issues take center stage, with the appellant claiming that the builder failed to register their project under RERA. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may attempt to circumvent regulatory requirements, often citing false claims of compliance or obtention of necessary clearances. In this case, the builder contended that they had not registered due to a false claim of obtaining fire clearance, which underscores the need for vigilant verification of builder claims.

Delayed development works is another significant theme, with claims indicating that the builder had not completed requisite development works. These works typically include the formation of an association, the transfer of corpus …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from WATERLINE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.