CIN | U55101KA2008PTC045815 |
---|---|
Year Established | 28-Mar-08 |
Address | Miraya Rose by UKN, 66/1 Siddapura Village, HAL – Varthur Main Road, Whitefield, Bangalore Bangalore KA 560066 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Waterline Hotels Private Limited operates within the hospitality sector and is primarily involved in real estate development in Karnataka. Like many builders in the industry, they face the rigors of legal scrutiny, illuminating their dealings with customers and regulatory bodies. This blog aims to provide a detailed understanding of the builder's legal standing, especially in light of a recent complaint, and offers insights for potential buyers.
Waterline Hotels has experienced a single complaint against them, which has resulted in a loss. The case revolved around the appellant’s claims regarding the builder's failure to register their project under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and to complete essential development works. Here’s a brief breakdown of the critical elements of the case:
In this instance, the commonality in the builder's loss appears to stem from procedural non-compliance. Failure to adhere to RERA registration requirements is a significant risk factor that leads to legal disputes. This not only affects the builder's credibility but also the rights and protections afforded to buyers under the act.
Interestingly, there are no records of cases won by Waterline Hotels, indicating a concerning trend. This absence reflects a potential pattern of underperformance in legal compliance and customer satisfaction. The lack of successful defenses in disputes may highlight issues related to project management, legal oversight, or customer engagement strategies.
Considering the available data, Waterline Hotels Private Limited shows a troubling legal record, having lost their sole complaint. This pointedly highlights a lack of adherence to critical regulatory requirements essential for the functioning of real estate projects. Potential buyers should approach with caution, being fully aware of their rights and the legal ramifications involved in any purchase.
With rigorous research, open communication, and careful consideration of legal implications, prospective buyers can navigate their choices effectively and safeguard their investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Waterline Hotels Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around issues of compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), delayed development works, and disputes over occupancy certificates.
The RERA compliance issues take center stage, with the appellant claiming that the builder failed to register their project under RERA. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may attempt to circumvent regulatory requirements, often citing false claims of compliance or obtention of necessary clearances. In this case, the builder contended that they had not registered due to a false claim of obtaining fire clearance, which underscores the need for vigilant verification of builder claims.
Delayed development works is another significant theme, with claims indicating that the builder had not completed requisite development works. These works typically include the formation of an association, the transfer of corpus to that association, and the rendering of accounts for maintenance. The builder's occupancy certificate from BBMP suggests an attempt to show compliance with some regulatory requirements while neglecting critical responsibilities towards homeowners and the community.
The common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases are striking. In each instance, the failure to comply with RERA and complete development works as promised led to the verdicts against them. The builder's defense often revolved around their possession of an occupancy certificate, which they seemed to believe would suffice for their obligations. However, the Authority made it clear that RERA compliance is paramount and overridden any other considerations.
The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that homeowners and prospective buyers should be acutely aware of the regulatory compliance of builders, ensuring they do not fall prey to false assurances. It is crucial to verify registrations, project statuses, and the completion of development works before making any commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/UR/220614/00096… | Karnataka | UKN Residents Welfare Association filed a complai… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | UKN Residents Welfa… | Waterline Hotels Pr… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3677043 |