| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When selecting a builder for your dream home, understanding their track record can be critical. Waterstone Developers, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, has had limited legal conflicts, which can shed light on their business practices. In this post, we will analyze the legal history of Waterstone Developers based on available data, highlighting patterns in complaints and verdicts.
Overview of Legal Cases
Waterstone Developers has faced a total of 1 complaint. Notably, this resulted in 0 cases won and 1 case lost. The case that was dismissed occurred after the complainant withdrew the complaint, rather than following a ruling in favor of the builder.
Cases Won
- Summary of Cases: The sole case filed against Waterstone Developers was disposed of as withdrawn; specific details on appellant and respondent claims were not provided. Since the case was not adjudicated on its merits, no definitive win for the builder can be ascertained from this record.
Cases Lost
- Loss Statistics: Waterstone Developers has one loss on record, which is reflective of their limited experience in the legal arena. Since the case that went to resolution was withdrawn, understanding patterns around this loss is quite straightforward—it indicates a lack of substantial legal disputes on their record.
Analysis
Patterns in Cases
- Cases Lost: With only one complaint, which was concluded with the withdrawal by the complainant, there is insufficient data to identify patterns associated with lost cases or consistent issues. The loss here does not provide a clear insight into systematic issues that might be inherent in Waterstone Developers' operations.
- Cases Won: Given that the lone legal encounter concluded without a trial or judicial finding, there are no discernible patterns that could illustrate winning strategies for Waterstone Developers.
Conclusion
Overall, the data indicates that Waterstone Developers has limited legal entanglements, which could be seen as a positive sign for potential clients. However, with just one case having officially been logged—a withdrawal rather than an outright win or loss—it suggests that more information would be prudent for potential buyers.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Due Diligence: Before engaging with Waterstone Developers, ensure to gather more comprehensive feedback from current or past customers to understand their experiences.
- Seek Transparency: Ask the builder for more information on their processes and how they handle complaints to gain a clearer picture.
- Look for Regulatory Compliance: Verify that the builder complies with local laws and regulations to safeguard your investment.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Review Their Record: Assess the builder's history, checking for unresolved complaints or lawsuits.
- Check References: Talk to past clients to get their firsthand accounts of working with the builder.
- Understand Contracts Thoroughly: Ensure that you have a clear understanding of contract terms, payment schedules, and warranty details before proceeding with a purchase.
In conclusion, while Waterstone Developers has a minimal complaint record, engaging in further research and consideration will help inform a well-rounded decision as you navigate the home buying process.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Waterstone Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.
The cases can be broadly categorized into four types:
- Delayed Possession Claims: This theme encompasses complaints primarily related to delays in the delivery of units to the buyers. Common reasons for these delays include mismanagement, insufficient resources, and a lack of adherence to project timelines set forth by the builder.
- Non-compliance with Municipal Orders: Cases within this theme typically involve allegations that the builder failed to comply with orders or regulations mandated by local municipal authorities. This may include everything from zoning violations to non-compliance with safety standards.
- Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification: This category includes complaints that arise from disagreements over the classification or intended use of land involved in the development. Plaintiffs may argue that the builder has improperly converted land from one use to another without adequate approvals or consideration for the legal implications.
- Penalties for Project Delays: In these cases, the focus is on the penalties that buyers or other parties seek to impose on the builder for significant delays in project completion. The complaints often argue that the builder should be held financially responsible for the repercussions of these delays.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the most common trigger for litigation involves delays in project delivery and disputes related to the builder's adherence to timelines. Buyers also frequently contest penalties that they believe are unfair or were imposed without sufficient justification.
The builder's losses in these cases highlight several failures on their part, including:
- Insufficient Evidence: In many instances, the builder was unable to provide adequate evidence to support their claims or defend against complaints raised.
- Non-compliance with Legal/Regulatory Requirements: Cases often pointed out the builder's failure to comply with municipal orders or other regulatory requirements, leading to legal consequences.
- Misunderstandings of Land/Project Classification Rules: Disputes over land use and classification suggest that the builder may have had a fundamental misunderstanding of the rules and regulations governing their development activities.
Overall, this analysis indicates a need for Waterstone Developers to address significant operational and compliance issues to mitigate future legal risks.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/A/Online/Ahmeda… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case disp… | ["Withdrawal of com… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Mr.Devalkumar Yoges… | Waterstone Develope… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1CPcYX6HoaR2Tp1GaSxXzbk7Bo5OpsWVQ |