WELCON INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Odisha
| CIN | U45202OR2009PTC010770 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 22 April 2009 |
| Address | PLOT NO-181/3723, D07, MUKUNDA PRASAD KHORDHA , KHORDHA, Orissa, India - 752057 |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Welcon Infrastructure Private Limited operates in the construction sector, primarily focused in the state of Odisha. The firm’s reputation is reflected in its legal history, which has seen a modest number of complaints. This blog post explores the builder’s past legal cases, outcomes, and essential information for prospective buyers in the market.
Legal Case Overview
Welcon Infrastructure Private Limited has a total of one complaint registered against it. Let’s delve into the specifics of the case:
Case Details:- Claims from the Complainant: The complainant alleged that she paid Rs.44,80,000/- and sought the delivery of a duplex house, along with interest payment and compensation for delays.
- Claims from the Respondents (Builder): The builder contended that the full payment from the complainant had not been made and sought to dismiss the case.
- Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant by directing Welcon Infrastructure to complete the construction and hand over possession, contingent on receiving the outstanding balance of Rs.12,20,000/-. Additionally, the builder was ordered to pay interest at a rate of 9.70% per annum on the amount of Rs.42,80,000/- paid by the complainant.
Analysis of Legal Outcomes
Patterns in Cases Won
In the case won by the builder, it was emphasized that the complainant had not fulfilled her payment obligations fully. This indicates a recognition of the importance of contractual compliance from the builder's perspective. In this situation, the builder successfully defended the claim with evidence and arguments regarding the alleged non-payment.
Patterns in Cases Lost
Since this is the only case recorded, it serves as an isolated instance concerning the builder's performance. However, it showcases a critical area: the need for transparency in financial dealings between builders and buyers. The loss appears to stem from potential communication gaps around payment statuses and timely project completion.
Conclusion
Welcon Infrastructure Private Limited has a limited legal history, with one documented complaint leading to a ruling against them. This suggests that while they may generally be regarded favorably, issues related to payment clarifications and project timelines require addressing.
Tips for Potential Buyers
If you are considering purchasing property from Welcon Infrastructure Private Limited, keep these tips in mind:
- Documentation: Ensure you have clear, written agreements about payment schedules and project timelines.
- Payment Records: Maintain detailed records of any payments made to mitigate disputes regarding outstanding balances.
- Communication: Stay in regular contact with the builder for updates on construction progress.
- Legal Advice: Consult with a real estate lawyer before signing any contracts to ensure your rights are protected.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
When selecting any builder, consider the following:
- Research: Look into the builder’s past projects and customer reviews.
- Licensing and Certification: Verify that the builder is properly licensed and bonded.
- Financial Stability: Consider the builder's financial history to assess reliability.
- Project Timelines: Study the typical project timelines the builder adheres to and whether they meet industry standards.
By taking these precautions and considering past performance, buyers can make informed decisions and minimize risks in their real estate investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Welcon Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment and compensation.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers who allege that the builder failed to deliver possession of their homes on time. For instance, in one significant case, a complainant sought various reliefs, including delivery of possession of a duplex house, interest payment for the delay, and compensation for the distress caused. These cases often highlight the frustration and financial strain that buyers experience when builders do not meet their commitments.
The second theme revolves around disputes over the payment amounts and the compensation that buyers believe they are owed. In the example mentioned earlier, the builder contested the claims by stating that the buyer had not paid the full amount owed, indicating a breakdown in communication or a misunderstanding about payment requirements. This shows a troubling trend where builders may not always be transparent about payment conditions or may miscommunicate their expectations, leading to legal consequences.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties for delays, disputing the builder's claims of incomplete payments, and a general lack of trust regarding financial transactions between builders and homebuyers. Buyers may feel compelled to take legal action when they believe their payments entitle them to timely possession and adequate compensation, and builders may defend themselves by arguing that buyers have failed to fulfill their payment obligations.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, the builder was directed to complete the construction and deliver possession to the buyer once the balance of the payment was received, along with interest compensation. This verdict implies that the builder's defense—that the buyer had not paid in full—was not sufficient to override the buyer's rights to possession and compensation. Such outcomes suggest that builders may be losing these cases due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with payment agreements, or an inability to meet project timelines as promised.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Case No.3… | Odisha | The complainant, Mrs. Birsumanti Sunita Dora, fil… | ["Non-delivery of p… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Mrs. Birsumanti Sun… | Welcon Infrastructu… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/39-2022.pdf |