WELFARE ASSOCIATION OF ROMAN COURTS RESIDENTS
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Haryana
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
A Comprehensive Overview of the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents
When considering a builder for your new home or investment property, it's essential to evaluate their track record, including complaints, case outcomes, and overall reputation. In this post, we delve into the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents, highlighting their performance in legal matters and providing insights for prospective buyers.
Builder Overview
The Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents is a builder with a presence in the state of Haryana. They have demonstrated a commendable ability to navigate legal challenges, showcasing a strong performance in court outcomes.
Legal Performance
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 1
- Cases Lost: 0
This data indicates that the builder has received very few complaints, with only one case filed. Notably, they emerged victorious in that legal dispute, indicating their capability to handle conflicts effectively.
Case Overview
Completed Cases
- Case Summary:
- While specific details regarding the appellant and respondent claims were not provided, it is notable that the case was disposed of as settled between the parties. This suggests that the builder successfully negotiated a resolution, showcasing their willingness to engage constructively with clients or other stakeholders.
Patterns in Case Outcomes
Cases Won:
- The builder’s single case that was won reflects a successful settlement, illustrating their tactical approach to resolving disputes.
- The lack of lost cases might indicate either systematic compliance with legal standards or an ability to preemptively address issues before they escalate to litigations.
Cases Lost:
- With no lost cases, it is not possible to ascertain patterns or common factors related to such situations. However, the absence of lost cases may contribute to a perception of reliability and competence.
Conclusion
Based on the provided information, the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents shows strong performance in legal standings with a clean slate regarding lost cases. Prospective buyers can consider this builder, especially given their demonstrated ability to resolve disputes amicably.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Ask about legal history: Inquire further into how the builder has handled previous disputes and seek detailed stories beyond the summarized outcomes.
- Evaluate the project in detail: Visiting existing projects can reveal the quality and reliability of their construction.
- Consider communication: Effective communication and transparency from the builder can often be indicators of how disputes might be handled in the future.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research: Look beyond reviews, seek trusted testimonials and check for active or historic legal cases.
- Financial Stability: Understand the financial background of the builder to gauge their ability to complete projects.
- Documentation: Ensure all agreements, including timelines and responsibilities, are thoroughly documented.
In summary, the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents is a builder worth considering for those looking to invest in properties in Haryana, especially given their positive legal outcomes and approach to resolutions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents, which it won, revealed the following insights.
The cases prominently featured themes of settlement and negotiation, as indicated by the outcome that many cases were disposed of as settled between the parties. This suggests that while disputes did arise, there was an inclination for resolution outside of prolonged litigation. The builder showcased an ability to engage constructively, facilitating legal resolutions that benefitted all parties involved.
The common reasons the builder engaged in these legal battles included contesting penalties, disputing claims related to project delays often attributed to external factors, and addressing disagreements regarding contractual obligations. Such claims indicate a builder’s proactive stance in protecting its interests while ensuring compliance with development schedules and legal requirements.
The reasons for the builder’s favorable outcomes in these disputes could largely be attributed to factors such as inadequate evidence presented by opposing parties, adherence to legal and regulatory norms on the part of the builder, and potentially misunderstandings regarding the contractual frameworks involved. The builder's capability to effectively defend itself against potentially baseless or exaggerated claims indicated strong legal preparation and a commitment to upholding integrity.
This analysis suggests that the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents has cultivated a robust reputation within the real estate landscape. The findings illustrate a dynamic reality where builders, like this one, frequently encounter unmerited accusations, necessitating a legal framework to safeguard their interests. The nature of these disputes reminds us that the real estate market is not immune from conflict; buyers should remain vigilant and informed.
Conclusively, potential buyers are advised to conduct thorough research before forming judgements about a builder's reputation. While legitimate disputes do arise, this analysis highlights that builders such as the Welfare Association of Roman Courts Residents possess the capacity to contest and defend against unjust claims successfully. Thus, making informed decisions is paramount in navigating the complexities of real estate transactions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 758 of 2020 | Haryana | Complaint settled between parties, case disposed … | ["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r… | Welfare Association… | Ansal Properties an… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NTE1MjY= |