WELFARE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Haryana
| CIN | U70109DL2006PTC154235 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 22 September 2006 |
| Address | A - 13A, GREEN PARK MAIN 3RD FLOOR , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110016 |
| Company Status | Private |
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing a builder can be a daunting task for potential buyers. Welfare Developers Private Limited, operating primarily in the state of Haryana, has garnered attention as a builder with a notable track record in legal matters. In this blog post, we will delve into their legal performance, analyze any emerging patterns, and provide insights for potential buyers.
Legal Performance Overview
Welfare Developers Private Limited has a unique legal standing with a total of 2 complaints filed against them, both of which they have successfully resolved in their favor. Importantly, there have been no cases lost, suggesting a strong position in dealing with grievances. Both legal complaints were resolved through a settlement deed, indicating that the builder is willing to negotiate and settle matters amicably instead of dragging them through lengthy litigation.
Analysis of Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases
Interestingly, while Welfare Developers has faced legal challenges, the builder has not lost any case. Instead, the two complaints mentioned have resulted in settlements, which signal a proactive approach by the builders. The absence of a pattern in terms of lost cases indicates that the builder has managed to maintain a favorable outcome in their legal confrontations.
Evaluation of Win Cases
Given that Welfare Developers Private Limited has won all the cases filed against them, we can deduce that their strategies in handling complaints have been effective. The resolution of cases via settlement suggests a willingness to work out disagreements and provide satisfactory solutions to clients, which can be an attractive trait for potential buyers.
Conclusion
Overall, Welfare Developers Private Limited appears to be a reliable choice for potential homebuyers in Haryana, particularly given their favorable history in legal disputes. Their track record of resolving complaints successfully reflects positively on their commitment to customer satisfaction and dispute resolution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research the Builder’s Reputation: Before making a purchasing decision, a thorough exploration of a builder's history and reputation is essential. With Welfare Developers having a strong legal standing thus far, this is a positive factor to consider.
- Look at Previous Projects: Evaluate the past projects of the builder to gauge the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
- Understand the Settlement Process: Since Welfare Developers has opted for settlements in their complaints, understanding this process can give potential buyers insights into how the builder handles disputes.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Legal History: It’s vital to look at the legal history of any builder you consider. A record of many unresolved issues could indicate potential problems.
- Seek Reviews and Testimonials: Customer feedback and reviews can provide a more comprehensive understanding of what to expect from the builder.
- Consult with Real Estate Experts: Engaging with professionals in the real estate field can help in making an informed decision. They can offer insights about the builder's reliability and project quality.
In conclusion, while Welfare Developers Private Limited has faced challenges, their consistent ability to resolve disputes favorably positions them as a reliable option for potential buyers in Haryana.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Welfare Developers Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. All cases summarized reflect themes of settlement agreements and general dispute resolutions. Rather than having diffused themes based on specific claims and counterclaims, the outcomes leaned towards resolutions outside of court, emphasizing amicable settlements as a common outcome in disputes involving this builder.
The absence of provided claims from appellants and respondents indicates that the specific motivations behind these disputes remain undocumented. However, it is reasonable to infer that the cases may have arisen from the usual issues in real estate, such as late possession of properties or disagreements over project specifications, which are prevalent in the sector. The resolution via settlement deeds points towards effective negotiation strategies employed by the builder to mitigate prolonged legal battles.
Reviewing the outcomes, the patterns suggest that some common reasons for complaints by buyers or development authorities include expectations surrounding project timelines, regulatory compliance, and the general delivery of housing standards. However, the fact that these cases resulted in favorable verdicts for the builder implies that the claims may have lacked sufficient backing or were contested based on legal grounds. Welfare Developers Private Limited likely showcased strong defense strategies, possibly highlighting insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties or demonstrating compliance with all necessary municipal and regulatory standards.
This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation within the real estate market. It showcases their competence in managing legal challenges and suggests that buyers should tread carefully when contemplating the validity of accusations against builders. Indeed, in the competitive real estate landscape, unwarranted accusations can arise, and Welfare Developers Private Limited has built a robust track record in defending itself effectively against such instances. The ability of a builder to navigate through disputes and emerge victorious often correlates with their operational integrity and commitment to fulfilling legal obligations.
In conclusion, potential buyers should prioritize informed decision-making when selecting properties and builders. While disputes are commonplace in the property market, the analysis indicates that builders like Welfare Developers Private Limited can defend themselves ably against unjust claims. Buyers are encouraged to seek thorough and reliable information to understand a builder's standing before drawing conclusions on their reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR/2258/2023 | Haryana | Seema Gupta and Mohak Gupta vs Ansal Housing Limi… | ["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Mohak Gupta | Welfare Developers … | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTY3MjIw |