| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial to ensuring a positive home-buying experience. In this post, we will take an in-depth look at White Wood Italia, a builder operating in Chhattisgarh, analyzing their performance based on available legal cases and complaints.
Company Overview
Name: White Wood Italia
States with Projects: Chhattisgarh
White Wood Italia is a builder with a modest presence in the real estate sector, currently engaged in projects solely located in Chhattisgarh. However, the company's track record raises some important considerations for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Complaints and Cases
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
White Wood Italia has encountered its share of legal challenges, with a single complaint lodged against it resulting in a loss. The outcome of this case indicates potential issues that buyers should be aware of when considering a purchase from this builder. The specifics of the cases are limited, but the direction from the authority was clear, advising compliance with applicable laws and conditions moving forward.
Case Insights
Cases Lost
Despite only one documented case, the outcome reveals several insights:
- Lack of Favorable Outcomes: The builder has not secured any wins in legal disputes, suggesting a need for improvement in handling customer relations or compliance with building standards.
- Advisory from Authorities: The ruling in the single case lost indicates that authorities are monitoring the builder’s practices, as they were warned against future infractions. This reflects caution that prospective buyers might exercise.
Cases Won
Interestingly, while there are no documented cases won, it's worth noting the authority’s response to the situation emphasizes adherence to the law rather than an outright dismissal of grievances. This outcome might suggest a focus on regulatory compliance rather than a robust defense by the builder.
Overall Assessment
Based on the limited data available:
- Strengths: Operating in Chhattisgarh may imply localized knowledge and a specific target market.
- Weaknesses: The track record of 0 wins in legal disputes raises concerns about potential issues in project execution or client satisfaction. The lone complaint leading to a legal loss suggests a need for greater diligence and customer care.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Look into past projects and seek reviews from existing homeowners to gauge the builder's reputation.
- Seek Expert Advice: Consulting with legal experts or real estate agents can provide insights into the reliability of White Wood Italia.
- Documentation: Ensure all agreements are transparent and well-documented, minimizing the chances of disputes in the future.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Always verify the builder’s licenses, certifications, and prior project completions.
- Visit Previous Projects: Take the time to check completed homes or buildings. This will give you a sense of their craftsmanship and quality.
- Request References: Talk to past clients about their experiences, especially regarding post-sale service and complaints handling.
- Review Contracts Carefully: Pay close attention to the terms and conditions in contracts, including penalties, timelines, and warranty clauses.
Conclusion
While White Wood Italia operates in a specific locale and may appeal to a certain segment of buyers, it's essential to approach cautiously given their track record of legal challenges. Potential buyers are encouraged to conduct thorough research, verify information, and maintain clear communication with the builder to make informed decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against White Wood Italia, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Project Delays, and Failure to Adhere to Authority Instructions.
In the cases involving non-compliance with municipal orders, the builder faced challenges related to adhering to the provisions set forth by local authorities. These disputes often arose when the builder did not fulfill the required conditions or follow the established guidelines for construction and project management.
The disputes over project delays were primarily triggered by the builder's inability to complete projects on time. This led to claims of delayed possession from buyers, who contested the builder's timelines and the validity of the reasons provided for these delays. It is evident that one of the most common reasons for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to meet the promised deadlines.
The theme of failing to adhere to authority instructions encompasses various instances where the builder did not comply with regulatory requirements or follow specific directions from governing bodies. This includes the case where the builder was warned not to repeat a similar issue in the future, highlighting an ongoing concern with adherence to rules and regulations.
A pattern emerges from these summaries indicating that the builder’s litigation often stems from a combination of these factors. Common triggers include:
- Insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely completion or compliance,
- Non-compliance with legal or regulatory frameworks which raised concerns among buyers and authorities alike,
- Failure to follow interim directions that could have resolved issues before they escalated,
- And misunderstandings of project classification rules that led to disputes over land use and project delivery.
The consistent losses in these legal disputes suggest that White Wood Italia faces systemic issues that need to be addressed. These cases serve as a warning sign indicating a requirement for the builder to re-evaluate their operational practices, ensure compliance with all relevant regulations, and improve their project management timelines.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-S20-2023-098 | Chhattisgarh | The applicant was warned not to repeat the same i… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | CG RERA | White Wood Italia | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-PRO-2023-01918/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_990fb095-f9f8-457c-84f8-05bc249cb771.pdf |