CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to investing in real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a smooth home-buying experience. In this post, we will delve into the builder Windchants, focusing on their legal track record and complaints to help prospective buyers make an informed decision.
Windchants operates in Haryana and has a single recorded complaint against them. As of now, they have not won any legal cases but have lost one case, which highlights a potential area of concern for future buyers.
Windchants faced one specific complaint where the complainant alleged failure to hand over possession of an apartment within the agreed timeframe. The complainant sought compensation for this delay.
The single case lost by Windchants indicates a notable pattern of failure to meet delivery deadlines. This suggests possible operational inefficiencies or project management challenges that could have impacted their ability to deliver on time.
It's interesting to note that in the context provided, there are no cases won by Windchants. This lack of positive legal outcomes could raise alarms for potential buyers regarding the builder's ability to resolve disputes favorably.
The data about Windchants presents a concerning image for potential homebuyers. With one complaint on record and a lost case reflecting delays in project completion, buyers should approach with caution. It is essential to consider these findings seriously when entertaining a purchase from this builder.
In conclusion, while Windchants continues to operate within Haryana, buyers should proceed with a careful evaluation of their options, keeping in mind the risks highlighted by the current data.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Windchants, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints lodged by the complainants. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays.
The cases often involved the builder failing to hand over possession of apartments within the agreed-upon timeframes. This delay prompted complainants to seek compensation for the prolonged duration in which they were unable to move into their properties. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances and claimed to have taken all necessary steps to expedite the completion of the projects. However, the authorities did not accept this defense and ultimately directed the builder to pay delayed possession charges in acknowledgment of their failure to meet contractual obligations.
A common reason for bringing cases to court in these instances was the builder’s inability to fulfill their promises regarding timely possession. Complainants were not only aggrieved by the delays but also by the builder's failure to provide clear timelines for rectification or completion. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate a significant trust violation in the builder-complainant relationship, often triggering litigation as a recourse for the complainants.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to substantiate their claims of unforeseen circumstances with compelling evidence. Moreover, the consistent failure to adhere to established timelines resulted in non-compliance with regulatory requirements, which further weakened their position in court. The authorities' decisions highlight a need for builders to adhere to realistic timelines and to ensure transparency in communication regarding project completion schedules.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5375 of 2019 | Haryana | The complainant, Praveen Gambhir, filed a complai… | Delay in possession… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Praveen Gambhir | Windchants | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/ODk0NjQ= |