CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Windsor Palms is a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh, with a focus on delivering residential properties. However, a close examination of their legal history reveals complexities that potential buyers should consider before making a purchase. Below, we explore the builder's track record, legal disputes, and offer crucial insights for prospective homebuyers.
The builder has been involved in only one notable legal complaint that has come to light. Here’s a detailed overview of this case:
It is important to note that Windsor Palms has a complaint count of 1, and they have lost this case, which raises questions about their operational practices and customer handling.
Based on the provided data, Windsor Palms' track record includes one legal complaint, which they lost, indicating potential issues regarding project delivery and contract fulfillment. While they have shown a level of willingness to settle amicably, the fact that they have not won any cases raises concerns about their credibility and reliability as a builder.
Overall, Windsor Palms presents a mixed picture for potential buyers. While their willingness to settle disputes with clients could be indicative of a desire to foster good relations, their loss in a significant complaint should raise red flags for anyone considering a purchase. As with any builder, due diligence is critical to ensure a safe and fruitful investment in your future home.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Windsor Palms, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in its dealings with clients. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment compliance.
The delayed possession claims, as exemplified by the case of Dr. Patel, highlight a significant area of concern for Windsor Palms. In these cases, buyers claim to have made substantial payments towards their flats, yet face prolonged delays in receiving possession. This indicates a potential mismanagement on the part of the builder, causing considerable inconvenience and loss to buyers who might have been expecting timely possession of their properties.
Disputes over payment compliance show another facet of the builder's troubles. Even when buyers fulfill their payment obligations, there can be recurring issues regarding the builder's claims of non-compliance or insufficient payments. The case of Dr. Patel illustrates this, where despite paying a significant amount of Rs. 40.80 lakhs, Windsor Palms contended that he had not met his contractual obligations. This pattern suggests a troubling lack of transparency or a potential miscommunication in the payment requirements set by the builder.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting possession delays, disputing payment requirements, and disagreements over contractual obligations. Buyers often find themselves in litigation due to the builder’s failure to adhere to timelines or clear payment terms. The builder's consistent losses in these legal battles point towards a systemic issue within their operational practices, resulting in repeated failures to meet client expectations and comply with contractual agreements.
The outcomes of these cases indicate that Windsor Palms has faced challenges that can be attributed to several factors. The builder's losses often stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims, a lack of compliance with the agreed-upon payment terms, and an inability to fulfill their promises of timely possession. These consistent patterns should raise concerns for potential buyers considering investments in Windsor Palms' projects.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-8/8 ,-8-652 | Madhya Pradesh | Dr. Jeevan Patel filed a complaint against Windso… | ["Delayed Possessio… | {"appellant_claim": "Dr. Patel claimed that he bo… | Dr. Jeevan Patel | Windsor Palms | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/335021392560.pdf |